Here is Supervisor Rexroad’s response where he calls out Davis residents for supporting social programs but not being willing to house them in Davis.
I just took some time to read over these comments [on the re-entry facility] and am struck by one thing.
Most of you folks that read this are from Davis. Some of you are questioning why this project should not be located in Woodland. That is a fair question.
Another fair question is when the people of Davis are going to step up to the plate to provide land use that facilitates social services?
Woodland actually has a mission that provides food and housing for hundreds. Does Davis have a similar permanent facility? No. It moves around from place to place so as not to upset any one neighborhood.
Woodland is the location of a large facility for the Yolo County Housing Authority. Davis has a few locations that are a fraction of the size of the one in Woodland or West Sacramento.
The Housing Authority just purchased a home in Woodland and will likely purchase one in West Sacramento next. This was Prop 63 money for the mentally ill. Davis?
I don’t want to hear about a bunsh of new senior housing either. Woodland has plenty of that and places it almost without objection from the community.
I hear many of you claiming that you desire social services to be provided — just not in Davis. That part is left out. Somewhere else in Yolo County would be fine.
The largest piece of industrial zoned property in the unincorporated part of Yolo County is Covell Village. How about that location?
The re-entry facility is something that we are going to work through over the coming weeks and even years.
My question for you is — what land is Davis going to set aside for some of these things?
When some of you question my desire to do these things I simply point to the leadership Woodland took to place the Wayfarer Center over the objections of a few neighbors. My vote was the deciding one and my involvement was great. Woodland did that. Davis?
It seems funny to me that for all the social programs that the people that read this blog are likely to advocate for — the use of land in your precious city never seems to be part of the message.