Examining Yolo County Gang Claims

ganginjunction_catby Eric Alfaro

According to statistics obtained from the Yolo County District Attorney, 1,088 validated gang members currently reside in Yolo County.  Additionally, the  D.A has confirmed the presence of ten active gangs in the County:

Gangs operating in Yolo County:

  • Norteno
  • Crips
  • Vagos
  • Nazi Low-Riders
  • 1-80 Boys
  • Surenos
  • Tiny Rascals Gang (TRG)
  • AUSA Skinheads
  • Mara Salvatrucha (Ms-13)
  • F***ed Up Punks (FUPS)

The gang members in Yolo County have all been validated through a gang validation process outlined by the California Gang Node Advisory Commission

2.18. Criteria To Determine Gang Profile: A subject can be entered into the CALGANG® database when two of the following criteria are found through investigation, coupled with the officers training and expertise. The only single criteria approved for entry is an in-custody jail classification interview:

  • 2.18.1. Subject has admitted to being a gang member.
  • 2.18.2. Subject has been arrested with known gang members for offenses consistent with gang activity.
  • 2.18.3. Subject has been identified as a gang member by a reliable informant/source.
  • 2.18.4. Subject has been identified as a gang member by an untested informant.
  • 2.18.5. Subject has been seen affiliating with documented gang members.
  • 2.18.6. Subject has been seen displaying gang symbols and/or hand signs.
  • 2.18.7. Subject has been seen frequenting gang areas.
  • 2.18.8. Subject has been seen wearing gang dress.
  • 2.18.9. Subject is known to have gang tattoos.
  • 2.18.10. In custody Classification interview. (All others require two criteria).

Although the Yolo County District Attorney’s office has been able to provide some statistical information on gangs; the office has not been able to substantiate those numbers.

Under the California Public Records Act (CPRA), the public has the right to inspect public records when those records do not hinder on current investigations or on sensitive confidential materials.

A gang validation list serves two main purposes for law enforcement officials. First, it allows the county to gauge the degree of gang activity in the region. Secondly, they facilitate the District Attorney’s gang enhancements on criminal convictions. With this universal way to identify gang members, conviction punishments can be increased, sometimes greatly, with a gang enhancement added to a criminal conviction.

The Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has never released demographic or age records related to gang members in Yolo County. The Office claims that since certain records have never been compiled by any Yolo County law enforcement agency—they have not been able to provide them to the public.

The District Attorney’s office can identify 1,088 validated gang members in Yolo County, and according to them, no gang validated inmates are currently being kept in the Yolo County Jail.

Either convicted criminal gang members are receiving heavy prison time, and thus bypassing county jail or Yolo County has no criminal gang problem. The question daunts on many people; How can the Yolo County Jail hold no validated gang members when Yolo County allegedly has 1,088 of them on the loose?

This clear discrepancy with being able to identify 1,088 gang members, and not being able to retrieve their age or demographic information has many people asking questions.

Transparency in the Yolo County justice system has reached a very unfortunate roadblock.

The “gang problem” in Yolo County must be approached holistically. Many low socioeconomic communities run the risk of being considered “gang areas”. People in rough neighborhoods run the risk of being seen “affiliating” with documented gang members.

Sooner or later kids from areas that have become marginalized, with enough association, run the risk of becoming validated gang members themselves.

Objective claims cannot be made about Yolo County’s gang problem when important facts have yet to be compiled by the D.A’s, Yolo County Gang Task Force.

How is it that information like the age and demographic of gang members has never been archived by the Yolo County District Attorney?

UC Davis recently discovered that forcible sex offenses from 2005-2007 had been significantly over-reported. The over-reporting was uncovered with the help of the Clery act, which requires publications of yearly reports containing specific campus crime statistics.

In Yolo County,  gang statistics have never been completely validated. Without a paper trail confirming statistical claims, a degree of doubt will always surround Yolo County’s gang problem.

The most recent (September 2009) California Department of Justice (DOJ), Death in Custody report , fails to reflect the death of Luis Gutierrez, a Woodland native killed on April 30th, 2009 by undercover gang suppression sheriff deputies.

Questions as to whether the Yolo County Justice system is accurately reporting records to the public and state have encouraged many concerned citizens to organize around the Yolo County District Attorney.

*Yolo County Gang Statistics 2008

About The Author

Disclaimer: the views expressed by guest writers are strictly those of the author and may not reflect the views of the Vanguard, its editor, or its editorial board.

Related posts

11 Comments

  1. merixcoatl20

    [quote]This clear discrepancy with being able to identify 1,088 gang members, and not being able to retrieve their age or demographic information has many people asking questions. [/quote]

    The discrepancy is obvious, but the reasons might not be. This means that Officers are going around detaining individuals, without arresting them, and classifying them as gang members.

    The classification serves as a “strike” against those individuals the day they enter a court room and get a “gang enhancement” slapped on.

  2. 3doorsdown

    I have recently had the unfortunate experience of learning the critia first hand. I found it was quite detailed but it’s application conviluted. In a court room experience, via a “gang expert” I was disturbed to learn I could possibly be classified as a “gang affilitate or associate”. Based on having continued contact with someone that is suspected of being a gang member.

    As much as I hate it, there are a few people that are either relative, close family friends, or persons that have lost there way. I may have even I suspected gang involvement. I do not nor have I ever condoned gang activity making it known I have no tolerance. Be that as it may, if for some reason I happened to hear something or witness something, my credibility could be questioned. My point is, although it looks good on paper, it doesn’t make it a sound practice.

  3. Rich Rifkin

    [quote]This means that Officers are going around detaining individuals, without arresting them, and classifying them as gang members.
    [/quote]Who are the gang members victimizing? Are the people they are harrassing, beating up, shooting, stabbing, vandalizing, threatening and so on all other gang-bangers? Are victims of gang-bangers helped by knowing who it is who is terrorizing them?

  4. merixcoatl20

    [quote]Who are the gang members victimizing? Are the people they are harrassing, beating up, shooting, stabbing, vandalizing, threatening and so on all other gang-bangers? Are victims of gang-bangers helped by knowing who it is who is terrorizing them?[/quote]

    Who says they are gang members? Just because they happen to live in a “gang areas”.

    If they are victimizing people why aren’t they in county jail? ZERO gang members in county jail.

    What if Demographic details show that a majority of the alleged “gang members” are exclusively from certain ethnic groups and young middle school kids?

    What is wrong with asking questions?

  5. merixcoatl20

    [quote]I asked you two questions, but got no answers. So apparently my asking questions served no purpose.[/quote]

    Do you have the courage to ask the District Attorney those questions? He is the only one that can give you concrete answers.

    Your clever maneuvering around semantics is the true mark of a political infant. The Davis enterprise has some soul searching to do.

    I won’t dignify your comments anymore.

  6. Rich Rifkin

    [quote]Your clever maneuvering around semantics is the true mark of a political infant. [/quote]Your calling me an infant still fails to answer my questions, big boy. [quote] I won’t dignify your comments anymore. [/quote] You seem to lack dignity in your answers, big boy.

  7. Sacramento

    I keep reading case by case, articles one after the other about the problems Yolo Justice system. There is enough there for any one to wonder. There is a clear need for an independent federal investigation of the system. Hopefully we will find that we do not have any problems at all and everything is good and all this is unfounded hysteria???? (I pray)

  8. Concerned Mother

    I am relieved to come across this website, and discover that other families are being affected by these fabricated “Gang” validations. I am outraged that my son has just received ten counts of felonies by the District Attorney, all of them attached with “Gang Enhancement” charges. My son has never claimed to be a member of any gang, and he has never been in any trouble with the law. One of his close friends, who was falsely validated as a gang member, is currently being charged with assault with a deadly weapon over a minor fist fight that resulted in no injuries. This is ridiculous, and I feel that someone needs to stand up and put a stop to the paranoia and exaggeration revolving around these so called Gang claims. How can we get attention placed on the victimization of these young men by the Yolo County Gang Task Force and The DA?

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for