West Sac Police Deny Allegations of Wrong Doing

Vasquez-2Defense Attorney Responds: “It’s clearly excessive force”

3 pm UPDATE: the DAs office has declined to file charges against Mr. Castro.  The judge has ordered the cell phone turned over to his attorney.  We will soon learn what really happened.
The Vanguard reported earlier today that West Sacramento resident Jesus Castro was arrested and had his camera confiscated by West Sacramento police while videotaping an incident of police brutality according to Attorney Anthony Palik and other West Sacramento activists.
West Sacramento Police Lt. Tod Sockman told the Vanguard this morning that, on Sunday July 17 at approximately 9:00, police were called to Simon Terrace regarding a large fight with beer bottles being used as weapons. When officers arrived to find two large groups faced off with each other.
Aristeo Vasquez-Munoz was arrested for assault and battery and child endangerment. 

According to Lt. Sockman, “While he was being taken into custody, he was resisting and non-compliant and fighting with the officers and so they used a baton to distract him while they got the handcuffs on him.”

He said that they could not get the handcuffs on him so they hit him with the baton.  “Once he complied,” he was handcuffed.

According to a written statement, “The events were out of the field of view of our in-car camera but the audio was recorded. The officer can be heard directing the suspect to stop resisting and that he was under arrest.”

The statement added, “As customary, photographs were taken and the suspect was taken to Woodland memorial to be checked prior to booking at the jail.”

However the defense and apparently a number of the witnesses tell a different story.  Anthony Palik told the Vanguard that there were some youths who were causing problems and harassing the people who lived at the complex.  Some of those people called the police to ask them to help them.

“True to form, the West Sacramento Police Department overreacted, which is their style,” he said. 

He added, “The situation escalated because of the officers.”

Mr. Vasquez according to Mr. Palik, “was essentially defending his home and the police officers didn’t take the opportunity to figure out what was going on.”

Mr. Palik earlier told the Vanguard that Mr. Vasquez’s story is, “They told him to come outside, he came outside.  They told him to lay on the ground.  He laid down on the ground and they started beating him with the batons on his leg.”

“When Mr. Vazquez asked him why he was hitting him with his baton – Mr. Vasquez said he was laying prone on the ground with his hands over his head and was not doing anything to resist – the police officer said, ‘I’m beating you because you’re a Mexican.’ “

“Apparently there were a lot of people who saw this and witnessed it,” Mr. Palik said.  “There were a lot of people around…  There were a lot of bystanders, mainly people who lived at the apartment.”

How Mr. Castro came to be involved is also subject to dispute.

The police’s version claims that while Mr. Vazquez was being arrested, one of the alleged victims claimed Mr. Castro was “making motions across his neck, he’s saying he’s going to cut my throat.”

According to Lt. Sockman one of the officers “sees some kind of a motion” but he was “yelling and trying to incite to keep the fight going.”

When they make contact with him, “He was highly intoxicated and trying to incite this thing.  So he was arrested for being drunk in public.  He wasn’t resistive, but heavily intoxicated.”

The police did not see a video camera, but they assume that he may have been recording using his cell phone.

“When he was booked into the Yolo County jail, the cellphone was booked in with him,” Lt. Sockman told the Vanguard.  He added that it was not confiscated, it was booked with him at the jail. 

“We haven’t attempted to look at or view any video from his phone,” he said, “so if it is on there, it is on there.”

The defense tells a different story, that one of the officers saw Mr. Castro filming this with his phone, according to Anthony Palik, “He walked across the street and down the sidewalk, and apparently at this point there were a lot of cop cars there and it was getting kind of crowded.”

“They arrested Mr. Castro, charged him with being drunk in public,” Mr. Palik continued, “he said he had not been drinking for at least seven hours prior to the incident and then he only had one beer.”

He was arrested and taken into custody at that point. 

Lt. Sockman added in his written statement, “Three other individuals were also arrested for public intoxication. They were yelling back and forth, inciting the situation. It was clear they had to be removed from the situation or the fight would most likely continue after the officers left the scene.”

Lt. Sockman said that he reviewed the video and did not see any evidence or hint of police brutality or excessive force.

“Our preliminary review indicates that the officers acted appropriately. As will all uses of force a formal administrative review will take place,” he said.

However, at least some of the incident took place out of the view of the in-car camera.

The statement from Lt. Sockman indicated, “The audio was recorded.”  He stated, “The officer can be heard directing the suspect to stop resisting and that he was under arrest.”

Anthony Palik strongly disputes this account.  “If you take a look at his legs, they are so badly beaten that such force would have been unnecessary in order to restrain a person with handcuffs on him,” he said and added, “It’s clearly excessive force.”

“A person against whom excessive force is used is entitled to resist.  That’s the law,” he said.

The Vanguard asked Lt. Sockman why the officers did not deploy a Taser in this situation.  “Every situation is different,” he responded.  “A Taser is available as a less lethal option but with the officer at close quarters with the subject they were attempting to arrest and with the crowd around the officers it may not have been the most effective.”

Mr. Palik did not know why they did not use the Taser and also found it odd that Mr. Castro and Mr. Vasquez are being arraigned so far apart in time.

Mr. Castro is scheduled to be arraigned this afternoon (Wednesday, July 20).  Mr. Vazquez is scheduled to be arraigned on September 13.  There will be a 6 pm demonstration and press conference at West Sacramento’s City Hall this evening.

—David M. Greenwald reporting

About The Author

David Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

Related posts

13 Comments

  1. AdRemmer

    No mention re: audio capturing the purported statement made by cop, hmmm.

    [quote]“The situation escalated because of the officers.”[/quote]

    Where’s supporting statements?

    [quote]True to form, the West Sacramento Police Department overreacted, which is their style,” [/quote]

    Again, where is the substantiation?

  2. Frankly

    I would believe the police story before I would the word of a drunk involved in a fight.

    Interesting that the Vanguard ran with the story that “the police confiscated the video” and the police are saying they only took his phone in custody and it would still contain any video taken.

    Cop haters would likely be thinking that the cops already deleted the video. My assessment is that they are not worried about the video because they know it supports their account of the story.

  3. Fight Against Injustice

    I am happy that David is looking at both sides of the story. Both sides are important in order to get the true picture of what happened.

    David, please keep up with this story.

    It would be nice to know what is on the phone video. The defense lawyer should have access to this? Would the defense lawyer share that information with you? Or would the police share this information since they have already made a statement about the audio tape recorded.

  4. David M. Greenwald

    “Give me a break…that is just an unreasonable thing to believe. “

    What you mean an unreasonable thing to believe? Should I show you documented examples where police said similar things that were caught on tape or video?

  5. David M. Greenwald

    “I would believe the police story before I would the word of a drunk involved in a fight. “

    We don’t know that he was drunk. They only charged on guy with drinking and that not a guy involved in the fight. And he disputes that he was drunk.

  6. David M. Greenwald

    Now it gets interesting, the DAs office has declined to file charges against Mr. Castro. The judge has ordered the cell phone turned over to his attorney. We will soon learn what really happened.

  7. Iyah

    I agree with biddlin, not much objectivity from some of the comments. We need more facts. I’m glad the DA dropped the charges against Mr. Castro. This also gives credibility to what was reported to the Vanguard regarding Mr. Castro. It seems the DA agreed.

    I’m a little confused as to which video the West Sac PD said they viewed. Was it the car video which did not have everything in full view or was it the phone camera that was in custody at the jail?

    Also, glad to learn the judge requested that the phone be turned over to Mr. Castro’s attorney. If I were Mr. Vasquez or his attorney I would ask for a copy of the video from the phone.

  8. Double Bogey

    David…By all means I would be very interested to see or hear video or audio of the West Sac PD engaging in such racist behavior. Please post as soon as you can. By the way, I am pretty sure that the West Sac PD has dash cams…Which means that the officers are also equipped with audio mics that I beleive are recorded even if the officer is out of range of the camera…so if this racist comment was made it should also be on tape.

  9. David M. Greenwald

    I will let you know, the soonest that I could possibly know would probably be the preliminary hearing, if there is one. I will say that Mr. Vasquez did not mention it yesterday, whether that is meaningful or not, I don’t know.

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for