Jumpstart Davis with a Strong Second Event Featuring Local Startups

Bob Fung delievers his presentation on VoterPrep - courtesy photo
Bob Fung delivers his presentation on Voterprep – courtesy photo

The second Jumpstart Davis event drew two more speakers to talk about their experiences,  as the organizers continued one of their key goals, to have a monthly mixer. Prior to the event, the Vanguard profiled both Bob Fung from Voterprep and Kyle Cobb from Greenbotics.

Bob Fung said, “I believe Davis has the ingredients, has a vibrant start up environment.” He called Voterprep a “think globally, act locally company.”

He said he and his startup partner had some discussions and came to the conclusion that “technology is really changing the world quickly.” He said, that while technology has accelerated the pace of change in the world, it also creates huge benefits and side-effects. “In order to address these side-effects of we felt that some technology needed to be put into place in order to help collective problem solving.”

He argued that in the voting system, we suffer from these disconnects. Using an analogy from “A Christmas Carol,” he noted that one lesson was that “ignorance was doom.”

As they were developing their prototype, they approached Stanford Professor Larry Diamond for “expert feedback.” Professor Diamond is one of the foremost experts on democracy. He said about Voterprep, “The internet and mobile devices have the potential to greatly improve democratic processes in the US and around the world. By connecting voters directly with candidates on important issues through a nonpartisan platform, Voterprep could play a significant role in realizing this potential in the 21st century.”

They ran their program locally in both the 2014 Davis City Council election and the School Board election.

Mayor Pro Tem Robb Davis said of Voterprep, “I think the concept is good and I especially appreciate the work you did to provide video clips to allow people a quick way to hear the candidates talk about the issues. I think any information coming directly from the candidates is useful and strongly affirm the value of the approach you used. I also appreciate that it actually drew upon things the candidates had said or written elsewhere. It could become an excellent “one stop shop” for the voter.”

So how does Voterprep work? From the user’s perspective, they go to the website, find an election that they are interested in, and they can watch the viewpoints of the candidates that they are interested in.

There are two ways to do that. The simplest does not require any sort of log in, one simply interacts with the site. There is a more sophisticated interaction, where one logs in, enabling one to take notes, sign up for elections, and make comments.

From the candidates’ perspective – they sign up with the moderator and they are then allowed to present their viewpoints. Ideally, Bob Fung told the Vanguard prior to the event, “What we would like to put forward is for the candidate to author the viewpoint themselves either in video or in text and to place it there themselves. We are able to with the consent of the candidate, to take their viewpoints from publicly available material.”

There are two basic functions of Voterprep. One is to provide information freely, quickly and accurately. The other is to aid the voters in their decision process through taking notes, weighing pros and cons and recording their decisions, among other things.

He said that this function will be widespread soon. He said their own goal is modest. They don’t have to be the Facebook of voter information, they could be the “MySpace.” He said, “We just want to make a positive contribution, put some ideas out there, if they get taken up by someone else, great, no problem.”

Kyle Cobb tells his story about Greenbotics - courtesy photo
Kyle Cobb tells his story about Greenbotics – courtesy photo

Kyle Cobb said his goal was to speak about three topics that were close to his heart, “me, robots, and beer.” He said he would tie these back to an important theme, “The importance of building relationships, particularly at events like this.”

Greenbotics he said, was founded on the proposition “that we’re building the world’s biggest solar energy plants out in the desert, it’s where the sun is strongest, it’s also where we see the most months without rain every year, as a result of that you see really heavy soiling, which to me is a lot of energy that otherwise could have been captured.”


“We identified the need for an automated to clean at scale,” he said. “What we developed was a robotic solar planning cleaning solution. We make these here in Davis, California.”


He said that they found a great partner to acquire them – SunPower. SunPower is a global, diversified, solar energy company based in San Jose, now with an office in Davis.

The story begins about 15 years ago with his friend Mark Grossman. 10 to 15 years later, “Mark was in the solar industry and he identified this need.” He said that while Mark had always come up with crazy ideas, he “knew this one was real” as they had a whole team excited about it. “There was a lot of people behind our business,” he said.

He noted a number of key contacts along the way, stating, “In a lot of cases these were relationships that built up over the years. But in other cases, these were contacts that started at events like this over a simple beer.”

Mr. Cobb said, “I want to emphasize the importance of what we’re doing here.”

His advice to others is first to “put yourself out there.” Second, “People want to help. We got help in places we didn’t expect it. People get really excited about startups.” Finally, “just have some fun.”

Davis Chamber CEO Matt Yancey (left) with Davis Chief Innovation Officer Rob White (right) look on
Davis Chamber CEO Matt Yancey (left) and Davis Chief Innovation Officer Rob White (right) look on

At the last event, Bill Habicht, one of the organizers, told the Vanguard, “[The purpose] is to draw together innovative minds, startups, just have them meet each other to create new things.”

“Michael Bisch and I were talking about the Innovation Park/Innovation Center that were being discussed and kind of saw that there was this middle ground that wasn’t being addressed yet which is the innovation ecosystem. It’s more of a cultural piece, so we’re trying to help develop the innovation culture,” he explained.

Daniel Parrella, another organizer, said that he and Michael Bisch “both had a desire to build the startup community. Michael was the one who recommended startup communities to me. One thing we noticed that all startup communities had in common was a monthly networking event that showcases startup companies. We decided to launch Jumpstart Davis with the help of a bunch of people who helped organized.”

Michael Bisch and Bill Habicht and other organizers are hoping this will become a monthly happening in Davis and they are moving forward on the co-working space as well creating that $1 million startup fund.

Mr. Habicht said, “Right now we’re kind of open to ideas. We’re looking to crowdsource the ideas from the community to see where this is going.” He said he sees it as “a grassroots venture. One of the things is the $1 million startup fund that we’re hoping to raise. The co-working space that’s already in development and then events like this where people can get together and learn from one another.”

—David M. Greenwald reporting


If everyone who reads this post could pledge just $10 per month, we would meet all financial goals for 2015 and the Vanguard would be fully fiscally viable

About The Author

David Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

Related posts


  1. Davis Progressive

    people lament the negativity, but the negative columns/ articles generate far more reads, views, and comments.

    so here is a good thing happening.  my hats off to michael bisch and bill habicht.

  2. Matt Williams

    I have had prior commitments for both of the first two Jumpstart Davis events and regret missing out on all the positive energy they have generated.  With luck I will get to experience #3 first hand.

    Great work Michael and Bill and all the participants!

  3. Tia Will

    I feel very fortunate to have been able to attend this second event. I was delighted by the range of folks and ideas represented. It was especially heartening to me that there was interest in many different aspects of our community, not a narrow focus on how to make ever more money although I am sure that some will be successful at that as well.

  4. Tia Will


    A business has to make money to keep in business!”

    Only if you define “business” narrowly as an entity designed to produce profits for its owners or shareholders. If you define “business” more broadly to include entities such as Frankly has described or other social innovation related enterprises, not necessarily so. Co-operatives are not always based on the generation of money, but may also be centered around the exchange of goods and services. It simply is not true, as our popular culture  would portray that everything is about the generation of money. This was part of what was so exciting to me about this event. It seems that there are very involved members of our community that are not locked into a single way of looking at progress.

    Have you been to either of these events ?  If not, consider attending and you will see what I mean.


    1. Anon

      To Tia: So what you are saying is you don’t want businesses to “make money”; just exchange goods/services?  I am really at a loss to understand your position about “business”.  What “business” is “acceptable” to you?  The read I am getting from you is that to run a business to make money that creates jobs, that pays salaries to employees, that makes enough money to give back to the community, is somehow inherently wrong if it shows a profit to shareholders.  Please explain.

      1. Tia Will


        So what you are saying is you don’t want businesses to “make money”; just exchange goods/services? “

        I would like you to show me in any of my posts where I said that. It is a little unusual for you to pull the “Frankly” tactic of just throwing out an opinion that you think a liberal might hold and then denigrate it whether I have said anything even vaguely approaching that or not. You have completely chosen to ignore my statements that I have nothing against business, nor do I have anything against money. What I am against is businesses that prosper by paying their employees so little that they, as employees,  are unable to prosper as many of our largest businesses do. I am against large, prosperous companies using the issues of small businesses like Don Shor’s to hide behind by claiming that paying a living wage ( per the numbers provided previously by Don). I am against the government whether local, state or national subsidizing companies that are not in any need of assistance while declining to support those who actually need help.

        The issue is not what business is acceptable to me. The issue for me is the narrowness with what are society seems to view as productive activity. For example, we do not value or reward either financially, socially or intellectually those who take part in the care and education of our children, especially the youngest. We assume that these are very low level skills ( a huge mistake in my eyes) and so compensate extremely poorly for this critical societal task, whether done by the mother, some other relative, or someone who is looking to earn a few additional dollars to support his or her own family.

        We are willing to pay some ( myself included ) far more than we need to prosper while others, performing tasks as critical to the well being of our society are compensated at below living wages. It is this that to me is unacceptable.

        1. Anon

          “It was especially heartening to me that there was interest in many different aspects of our community, not a narrow focus on how to make ever more money although I am sure that some will be successful at that as well.”

          This statement is why I asked you to explain.  Businesses have to be in the business of making money to cover expenses and make profits for their shareholders.  Even nonprofits must make money to survive!  Nowhere in that sentence do you refer to big corporations that pay obscene salaries to CEO’s and low wages to workers.  Hence the reason I asked for further explanation.  A business would not survive if it did not make a profit for its shareholders, and paid its upper management sufficiently to acquire qualified people for these positions.  Do I think CEO’s should be paid hundreds of millions of dollars, while workers are paid essentially slave labor?  No.  I would be more in favor of CEO’s earning a percentage of profit, because too often they loot companies (even tho illegal) before the organization goes under.  But many companies are just barely afloat, hiring only part-time workers so benefits are not required.  Many large businesses are going belly-up because of many factors.  Vilifying businesses for making more money makes no sense!

  5. DT Businessman

    Thank you, David, for your ongoing coverage of the JumpStart….”movement” is probably a good description for it.  The intention all along has been to foster not just a startup community, but also an entrepreneurial culture in the broadest sense.  Social entrepreneurism most certainly is part of the effort.



Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for