Governor Stays Glossip Execution Pending Review of Drug Protocols

Death Penalty

death-penaltyJust over an hour before the scheduled execution of Richard Glossip, Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin issued a surprise 37-day stay to address questions about the state’s execution process that the U.S. Supreme Court in June had ruled constitutional.

“Last-minute questions were raised today about Oklahoma’s execution protocol and the chemicals used for lethal injection,” Governor Fallin said in a statement. “After consulting with the attorney general and the Department of Corrections, I have issued a 37-day stay of execution while the state addresses those questions and ensures it is complying fully with the protocols approved by federal courts.”

Lawyers and a mix of public figures have attempted to halt the execution of Mr. Glossip, citing evidence of innocence or at least skepticism of guilt in the case. Mr. Glossip is accused of paying the admitted killer, Justin Sneed, serving a life sentence, to kill Barry Van Treese, the owner of the Best Budget Inn where Mr. Glossip worked as the resident manager. He claims that Mr. Sneed concocted the story in order to avoid the death penalty.

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals reviewed evidence, but ultimately ruled narrowly against him.

“None of the trial witnesses have recanted their testimony, and Glossip has presented no credible evidence that the witnesses gave falsified testimony at trial,” Judge David Lewis wrote in the opinion. “Glossip’s conviction is not based solely on the testimony of a co-defendant and the execution of the sentence will not violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

Mr. Glossip’s attorneys have argued that Mr. Sneed lacks credibility, given his deal to avoid the death penalty. They have produced two witnesses who served time with Mr. Sneed, who claim that Mr. Sneed stated he acted alone, doing it for money. Another former cellmate in an affidavit wrote that Mr. Sneed boasted that he had set up Mr. Glossip.

Governor Fallin surprised many with the stay, as she had turned down previous requests from defense attorneys to stay the execution.

In a new development, State Attorney General Scott Pruitt issued a request for an indefinite stay of the executions of three men scheduled in the next month.

He wrote, “On September 30, 2015, Governor Mary Fallin issued an Executive Order 2015-42 rescheduling Glossip’s execution due to the Oklahoma Department of Corrections (ODOC) receiving potassium acetate rather than potassium chloride, the third drug to be utilized in the execution protocol.”

“Due to the events of September 30, 2015, and the imminence of the above-referenced executions, the Office of the Attorney General needs time to evaluate the events that transpired on

Missed Scott Sanders last year? Catch our discussion on Wrongful Convictions on November 15 - click on the photo to purchase your tickets
Today is Wrongful Conviction Day. Catch our discussion on Wrongful Convictions on November 15 – click on the photo to purchase your tickets

September 30, 2015, ODOC’s acquisition of a drug contrary to protocol, and ODOC’s internal procedures relative to the protocol. The State has a strong interest in ensuring that the execution protocol is strictly followed.”

In statement from the OK-CADP spokesperson Rev. Adam Leathers said, “We at the Oklahoma Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty are grateful for Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt’s recent request for the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals to suspend all scheduled executions. We hope they will concur. However, we ask our fellow Oklahomans to consider all of the issues over the availability and supposed ‘safety’ of the three drug cocktail, as well as all of the repeated execution postponements, and all of the complexities and doubt of guilt surrounding Richard Gossip’s case. We must ask ourselves: ‘Is this all worth it?’ How many resources have we as a state wasted and accomplished nothing more than convincing the rest of the world we lack civility?”

Previously, OK-CADP issued statements commending the governor’s decisions to stay the execution.

OK-CADP chair Connie Johnson said, “Our hearts are lightened and spirits encouraged by the Governor’s decision to grant a 37-day stay of execution for Richard Glossip today. While her reasons are less than what we were seeking, the outcome is one for which we are grateful and thankful to God, Who is still in control. Because of today, the need to continue educating Oklahomans about the death penalty’s flaws is greater than ever. Hope springs eternal.”

OK-CADP spokesperson Rev. Adam Leathers said, “We at the Oklahoma Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty are pleased at the recent 37-day stay of execution issued by Governor Fallin regarding issues over the drug cocktail. Although it was not the kind of stay of execution for which we were hoping and we do not agree with Governor Fallin’s position on the death penalty, she should still be commended for doing her due diligence in fulfilling the law. At the same time we also keep in our thoughts and prayers, Richard Glossip, his family, and the family of Barry Van Treese, for the emotional roller coaster all of them have undoubtedly experienced…a roller coaster that would consequently be eliminated with the abolishment of the Death Penalty.

“We are exceedingly grateful that Pope Francis made a request that Governor Fallin commute the life of Richard Glossip,” Rev. Leathers added. “This is a testament to how widely this case has spread and how the world will define Oklahoma’s civility by what follows.”

Some are hopeful this will give the defense the time they need to make the case for innocence.

—David M. Greenwald reporting


About The Author

David Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

Related posts

2 thoughts on “Governor Stays Glossip Execution Pending Review of Drug Protocols”

  1. Tia Will

    Last weekend, I attended a tour of old Folsom prison including the old “death row” as part of Family Day. I was most struck by the words of the custody officer conducting our tour. Now custody guards are not noted for their bleeding heart liberal attitudes and this guard was very clear in his belief in the death penalty. It is his words that I am paraphrasing. He stated that the physical configuration of the old death row constituted a means of torture for the men on death row. This was because of the physical lay out of the cells which were arranged in close proximity to the gallows. The person next scheduled for execution was in the cell closest to the actual gallows apparatus. When the prisoner in the adjacent cell was executed the next person in line could hear, but not see the execution. The sounds would be more muffled but still audible to each cell in the line. As each prisoner advanced towards his scheduled date, the sounds would become clearer and clearer until it was his turn. Clearly a practice that would and did invoke unnecessary fear in the condemned who of course being kept in isolation had no way of knowing when the next execution would occur. Clearly a form of  unjustifiable psychological torture even as seen through the eyes of a death penalty supporting member of prison custody.

    What I believe to be true is that what we are currently engaging in with our cat and mouse game of setting execution dates and times and then these last minute stays of execution is yet another form of psychological torture. Imagine being a prisoner ( regardless of whether or not you are actually guilty as charged and convicted), being told that you will die at a certain date and time, coming to accept this fate through a very difficulty psychological process, and then within one hour of the appointed time, being told essentially, “just kidding”, you have another 37 days to live at a minimum, but we won’t share you with you whether or not that is going to result in further stays or your imminent death, because we simply haven’t made up our minds yet.  Does any one else see this as “cruel and unusual punishment” and thus not constitutional.

  2. Davis Progressive

    can you imagine you are glossip – you are an hour away from having your life end, possibly for something he did not do.  he is spared that fate for six weeks.  so now he is facing an execution date in november.  in the meantime, an hour away he had mentally prepare for the end of his life, he was moved into a different place and now he is going to have to do it over again.  talk about cruel and unusual.  why not just give him lwop and a chance to prove his innocence?

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for