Why Would a Bus Stop Cause the Bus to Block an Intersection?


On my way to the Vanguard office on Thursday morning, I decided to cut down K St from 5th Street to 3rd Street. When I arrived at the corner a bus arrived at the same time as me. There were about six or seven people waiting to get on the bus.

Much to my chagrin, I found that the bus stop was almost right at the corner of K and 3rd and when the bus stopped there, it blocked the intersection for any car wanting to turn right. It stayed there long enough that I decided to take a photo of it.

When I got back to my office, I reached out to Unitrans General Manager Anthony Palmere. He explained that Unitrans works closely with the city in order to locate its bus stops. As one might expect, “there are usually several tradeoffs involved in each location.”

For one thing, “We generally put the bus stop on the far side of an intersection. That way, people can access the bus from either the street it is on or the street it intersects.”


Mr. Palmere met with the Vanguard on Monday and we walked around the downtown. We saw a number of different configurations.

Mr. Palmere explained, “If possible, it is placed far enough from the corner, so that it does not block traffic on the cross street as you experienced.”

Here, just to the south of the DJUSD, you can see an example of a bus stop that is on the far side of the street, which enables people to cross behind the bus where they are visible. It is also far enough away from the intersection that it is not blocking traffic.

Unfortunately, not all set ups are as ideal as the one on B Street.

Mr. Palmere explained, “There are two things that limit that, and both are present at 3rd and K Streets. “

First, is the presence of parked cars. As one might expect, “The City and nearby residents are often reluctant to eliminate on-street parking spaces to accommodate a bus stop, which is only at a stop for a relatively short period of time. Therefore, many bus stops in Davis are very short and the bus must stick out into the street during the times it is stopped there.”

“In the case of 3rd and K, though, the more significant issue is accessibility for people with disabilities,” Anthony Palmere continued. “Because the area further west of the intersection is grass, even if the parking were removed, the bus would not be accessible if it were to stop further west. In that case, the pavement would need to be extended an additional 40 or more feet so that the bus could pull in there and be clear of traffic. This would be a costly project and might also require the removal of shade trees and other landscaping. So, that is the main reason why that bus stop is at that corner and blocks traffic.”

“There are certainly other cases where the bus stops in Davis are awkward and result in auto traffic being delayed while the bus is there. Although you were delayed by a significant amount of time this morning, in the grand scheme of things, these types of delays are relatively short and the cost of eliminating them would further tax the City’s budget for street construction and maintenance,” he said.

Anthony Palmere showed the Vanguard a number of different stops and discussed the considerations involved.


Here is the stop in front of City Hall. Mr. Palmere explained that he is not a fan of it as he believes the cutout is a waste of otherwise productive space. While it allows the bus to get out of a busy traffic lane on Russell, it creates problems when it has to merge back onto the main traffic lane, causing delays to the traffic and the bus.


This is on B Street across from Central Park. This is a similar set up to K Street, except the stop is further down and they have eliminated some parking in order to accommodate the bus stop.


This is the other side of B St, with a similar set up. The bus can simply go into the bike lane, and make its stop.


It gets more tricky here at the corner of 3rd and C. The bus stop is blocked by parked cars. Mr. Palmere explained that when there are no passengers with disabilities, the bus can simply stop here and allow the passengers to exit in between the parked cars. However, if someone needs to use the ramp, they have to stop at the crosswalk cutout, blocking traffic.


Here at 3rd and E, the bus has direct access to the sidewalk via the bulb-out. Mr. Palmere explained that these features have greatly enhanced the safety for bus riders as it provides an easy and safe exit and access point to the bus.



Bus-7c Bus-7d Bus-7e

We spent some time here at the corner of 5th and D Streets. Mr. Palmere talked about the advantages of the new design for 5th. Previously, buses had to stop in the traffic lane and force cars to go around. Right now there is enough room for even large vehicles to go around the bus using the median, without going into the oncoming traffic lane. One of the tricky questions will be what happens when they go to the raised median phase of the project.

Bus-8 Bus-8b

Here you can see the Yolo Bus parked on the side of the street. You have one car about to pass on the left while another car makes a left turn onto 5th Street. Both are able to easily pass the bus on the left.

Bus-9 Bus-9b Bus-9c

Here you can see an Unitrans Bus going through the intersection of Russell and B St. The bike lane here is not wide enough to accommodate the bus. But an SUV is able to pass, moving slightly into the oncoming traffic lane.

—David M. Greenwald reporting

About The Author

David Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

Related posts


  1. Tia Will


    Nice article on a somewhat obscure issue.

    I think that my take on this issue is predictable but still worth stating. If there are safety issues, those should take precedence. Minor inconveniences to automobiles having to go around, or even wait for a bus to unload and load passengers, are negligible compared to the advantages of supporting the increased use of buses as the preferred means of transportation. Rather than favoring the preferences of those who object to walking a little further from their preferred parking spot to their destination, we need to be favoring those who are choosing the public transportation systems.

    1. David Greenwald

      My concern is that I could have attempted a risky move to get around the bus out of impatience. That would have had me go into the left lane and make a right around the bus, hoping someone would not be trying to make a left (or right) turn off 3rd Street. As it turned out someone did make a left turn off third which could have been problematic. I think it might be better to clear out two parking spots there and move the bus stop in from a safety stand point.

  2. Tia Will

    I think it might be better to clear out two parking spots there and move the bus stop in from a safety stand point.”

    I agree with your solution as preferable from the safety point of view. And would like to point out that if a driver’s impatience is the cause of a collision, that is completely on the driver, not the bus. However, in the interest of primary prevention, a few fewer parking spaces is definitely the best approach.

  3. Michael Harrington

    Very intetesting article. These things are the basics of operating a city and the more we all understand them, the better policies can be implemented.

  4. Alan Miller

    You did the right thing contacting Mr. Palmere.  Pointing these safety issues out is the way agencies learn where the issues are from the people on the ground.  However, as he pointed out, funding is very limited in a city the size of ours, and compromise is necessary until a project gets funded.  Such articles help point out where the problems are so transit officials are aware.

  5. Topcat

    This is a good article that points out some of the rather mundane but important issues involved in running a city.  I think that Unitrans does a very good job running the bus system.  Although I’m not a UCD student, I use the busses and I find them clean, and efficient.

    1. Anon

      Yes, Unitrans is exceptionally well run.  Every aspect of bus travel is carefully thought out.  Is it perfect? NO.  It never will be.  But Unitrans in general does a great job making bus travel within the city limits safe for all modes of transportation – which is no easy task.

  6. PhilColeman

    I think that Vanguard may have stepped on a rattlesnake here.

    California Vehicle Code, Sections 22500, and following, speak definitively on this issue. It is also noteworthy that buses and bus zones are mentioned, which means their presence on public streets was part of the legislative reasoning. We also need to remind ourselves that State Law is supreme (“Pre-emption”) and that local ordinance, policy, convenience has no relevancy unless the State specifically says locals can expand or amend. I saw no exemptions on point with this issue.

    My reading of these statutes shows no legitimacy to any of the placements of the bus stops, for the reasons or justifications cited. An interesting discussion would ensue if Mr. Palmere were again contacted, given the 22500 statutes, and then asked where does it allow you to do what you’re doing? And to Alan’s point on lack of funding–doesn’t matter.

    Were David to have hit that bus, suffered serious injury, and consulted a local tort lawyer, acceptance of the case on contingency would be a very high probability in my (non-attorney) opinion. This bone has a lot of meat on it.

    One caveat: Federal ADA laws pre-empt state laws. It is (very remotely) possible that ADA could give bus stop placement a mulligan for maximum access to wheel chair patrons. A defense attorney could argue it, but unless it’s specifically noted in the ADA legislation it probably would not stick.

    1. Anon

      “22500. No person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle
      whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid
      conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a
      peace officer or official traffic control device, in any of the
      following places:

      (a) Within an intersection, except adjacent to curbs as may be
      permitted by local ordinance.

      (b) On a crosswalk, except that a bus engaged as a common carrier
      or a taxicab may stop in an unmarked crosswalk to load or unload
      passengers when authorized by the legislative body of any city
      pursuant to an ordinance…”

      Please point to part of this law that indicates Unitrans is in the wrong… not following your reasoning…

      1. PhilColeman

        Subsection (b) “unmarked crosswalk,” and we’ll assume for the moment that there is an existing ordinance allowing this.

        Scan through the multiple photos showing the bus stopped blocking a marked crosswalk. You can’t park in a marked crosswalk, buses included.

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for