West Sacramento Residents Call for End to Gang Injunction; Justice for Juveniles in System

Four mothers of juveniles held in custody stand in from of the West Sac Police Station. Left to right: Tara Westford, Gloria Garcia, organizer Maria Grijalva (center), Regina Martinez, and Cathy Perez.
Four mothers of juveniles held in custody stand in front of the West Sac Police Station. Left to right: Tara Westford, Gloria Garcia, organizer Maria Grijalva (center), Regina Martinez, and Cathy Perez.

On Saturday morning, between 40 and 50 people held a protest on Jefferson Boulevard, near the West Sacramento Police Station, protesting the Yolo County DA and West Sacramento’s continued use of the gang injunction, which the protesters and other residents say is tearing the community apart.

“Friends and family members can no longer go to family barbecues or attend each other’s children’s birthday parties,” said a community activist. “They can’t go to the movies together, they can’t attend night school because classes get out after the curfew. This injunction harms the quality of life of our community.”

Activists believe that the gang injunction is responsible for four juveniles to be detained in custody for over a year without due process of law.

On Saturday, they announced a plan to further legally challenge the West Sacramento Gang Injunction, which was implemented in early 2011 following a lengthy trial.  Appeals are still pending for the legal challenge at the appellate level.

They are calling for an independent investigation of WSPD gang officer, Anthony Herrera, for lying during testimony.  They are also demanding the “Yolo County DA stop filing gang enhancement penalty charges against ALL Latinos in Yolo County.”

Broderick-16

The case that has driven some of this renewed questioning involves four juveniles: Angelo Christiano Yabes, 14; Joseph Gomez, 15; Vincent Xavier Perez, 16; and Xavier Patrick Westford, 17. In June of 2015 they were detained, and accused of three separate robberies of pizza delivery drivers – despite statements from all the drivers indicating they could not identify who assaulted them. The district attorney has recharged them as adults and under gang enhancements failed to show a case, causing all charges to be dropped and then refiled.

On April 7, 2016, the DA reportedly refiled the case, this time using a grand jury to gain indictments and try the youths as adults.

Local resident Maria Grijalva helped organize the protest on Saturday. She told the Vanguard, “The reason we have organized today is because we have four major issues that are going on here.”  She explained that “one is the gang injunction – it has been going on for many years and there are officially no gangs in West Sacramento.”

“The second reason that we’re here is because we have four boys, four minors that have been detained in jail without due process for over a year,” she said.  She said, while the charges have not stuck, “the DA keeps trying one thing after another to keep these boys in jail.”

Ms. Grijalva further noted, “In Yolo County, we have the highest direct filing rate of gang enhancement charges against our youth, so this means our youth are getting charged with life sentences when they do not merit that.”

Maria Grijalva pumps her fist during the protest
Maria Grijalva pumps her fist during the protest

Finally, she noted that gang officer Anthony Herrera “is making $150,000 to generate and document and criminalize our youth and send them in jail.”  She said, “He has falsified information, the public defender has called him on it while in trial and he also falsified information during the Gomez case with these four youths.”

The Vanguard also spoke with each of the mothers.

Gloria Garcia, mother of 14-year-old Angelo Yabes, told the Vanguard, “We’re out here because there’s four mothers and our sons are on a four co-defendant case.  They are all juveniles, they were direct-filed into the court by the district attorney.”

She explained that, during their preliminary hearing, the judge dropped them back to a juvenile case, because “they took away the gang enhancement because they did find… lack of evidence to prosecute them on that charge.”

When the judge dismissed the gang enhancement charge, it caused the case to revert to juvenile status.  However, the DA dismissed the charges and refiled, this time using the grand jury process in order to keep the gang enhancement in place and continue to charge the juveniles as adults.

Broderick-15

“(The DA) decided that he didn’t want to take the boys back to court, and take the chance of having the judge making the same ‘mistake’ so what he did was take it to a grand jury and indicted our boys,” Ms. Garcia explained.

“We’re just out here standing for our kids,” she said. “Instead of rehabilitating our boys, they are sending them away for life. All of our youth in this community especially.”

Tara Westford, mother of now 18-year-old Xavier Westford, said that her son celebrated his 18th birthday in custody at juvenile hall.  He was brought in allegedly on gang charges.  In May, he will have been in custody for a year.  The case has already been dismissed and refiled once.

Cathy Perez, mother of 16-year-old Vincent Perez, said they are here to “stop the gang injunction which is giving our kids sentences that can carry life sentences.”  She said, “There are a lot of discrepancies in my son’s case and there’s a lot of lies that are coming out.  I just want it all to be brought to the light because these boys are being accused and already labeled before they even went to trial.”

Broderick-5

“We’re just out here to support them, to bring them home,” she said.  “They’ve been incarcerated for close to a year, and we’re still at square one. Justice hasn’t been served for them.  They’re still sitting in juvenile hall.”

She said that he is being accused in multiple cases – she believes him innocent and, in one of his cases, the charges were dismissed. “I’m sure they don’t want to drop the other one due to the fact that is tying together the gang (charges). There is no evidence against my son – it’s nothing but hearsay that’s against my son.”

She explained, “They placed these boys in lineups and they should have never been in a lineup because all victims stated that it was too dark to even describe the people who assaulted them.  Somehow our boys got put in lineups because of minor things that they were doing – little petty stuff that they have gotten in trouble for.”  She said, “This time he is innocent and that’s why we’re here because I want them home.”

Regina Martinez, mother of Joseph Gomez, 15 at the time of his arrest, said, “We’re out here to stop the gang injunction because it’s affecting our children’s lives and we want to make a better community for our children.  We want them to know that they have support from the neighborhoods.”

“We want to make a change in these neighborhoods because it’s been going on too long that these injunctions are affecting us,” she said, noting that they can’t even go to children’s birthday parties.  “We can’t be a community because of this injunction.”

She said, “We started a non-profit organization, ‘Broderick is a Community, Not a Gang,’ and we want everyone’s support.  We’re going to make Broderick better for children and the community.”

—David M. Greenwald reporting

Broderick-6 Broderick-9 Broderick-13 Broderick-23 Broderick-20 Broderick-22

About The Author

David Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

Related posts

5 Comments

  1. Tia Will

    I have some questions.

    Was anyone killed ? Was anyone kidnapped ? Was anyone raped ? Was anyone assaulted ? Were there weapons involved ? Were any of these boys previously gang identified ?

    And finally, if not, what the heck is happening in our so called “justice system’ that 13-17 year olds ( at the time of the alleged crimes) can be considered “adults” ?  What happened to innocent until proven guilty ?

    1. David Greenwald

      I don’t have a huge amount of details, but as far as I can tell no one was killed, kidnaped, or raped. I don’t know if anyone was assaulted, weapons involved.

      Direct filing of juveniles is authorized under the penal code. Gang charges make it automatic.

  2. Tia Will

    Thanks. That prompted more questions.

    What is our stated goal here ?  Is it rehabilitation of these boys ?  Is it punishment….and if so…..for what given that they have been found guilty of nothing ? Is it community protection ?

     

  3. Miwok

    No one seems to be defending the innocence of the youths, just the “gang” designation?

    I could ask around town, (I have) and to state there are no gangs in West Sac or Woodland is specious.

    If they are not in a gang now they will be in Prison, but wait! There is no prison for simple robbery any more?

    I sure don’t see any photos of men in these photos.. Too bad.

  4. Tia Will

    Miwok

    Another way of looking at this.

    Is it ok with you for a youth to be detained for a year with no conviction ?

    Are all charged youths assumed to be in a gang regardless of formal gang identification ?

    If they are not in a gang now, they will be in Prison…..! Really, without a conviction !  What happened to innocent until proven guilty ?

    And as for a man in the photos….. how do you know it would not be worse ?  Have you never heard the statistics on domestic violence which is numerically much higher amongst men that women ? Is it your feeling that any man is better than no man ?

     

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for