ACLU Lawsuit in SC Case Where Girl Was Thrown By Officer

Kenny-NiyaBy Robin Shulman

One day last fall, Niya Kenny was sitting in her math class at Spring Valley High School in Richland County, South Carolina, when a police officer came into the classroom. A girl in her class had refused to put away her cell phone, and the teacher had summoned an administrator, who called on the officer assigned to the school.

Niya thought the officer’s appearance was bad news — his name was Ben Fields, but he was so aggressive that students knew him as Officer Slam. As soon as he entered the room, she called out for other students to record him.

Three different students made cell phone videos of what happened next. Fields picked the girl up, flipped her in her desk, and then grabbed an arm and a leg to throw her across the room. Niya stood up and called out, she recalled later. “Isn’t anyone going to help her?” she asked. “Ya’ll cannot do this!”

Niya was so scared she began to shake and cry. As Fields handcuffed the other girl, he turned toward Niya and told her she was going to jail, too.

Niya was arrested, handcuffed, charged as an adult, and taken to jail. She was released that evening with criminal charges of “disturbing a school.”

Today she’s fighting back. On her behalf, the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the South Carolina law that makes “disturbing a school” a criminal offense, on grounds that it’s unconstitutionally vague. The ACLU is also challenging another vague “disorderly conduct” law, which makes it a crime for students at school to conduct themselves in a “disorderly or boisterous manner.”

Every year, more than a thousand students in South Carolina — some as young as 7 years old — face criminal charges for not following directions, loitering, cursing, or the vague allegation of acting “obnoxiously.” If charged as adults, they can be held in jail for up to 90 days.

Students of color are four times as likely as white students to face criminal charges under this law. In Charleston, Black students are about six times more likely than their white peers to be charged under the statute.

Across the country, the ACLU is concerned about similar laws criminalizing routine adolescent behavior, which disproportionately affect kids of color.

The South Carolina law has been invoked to pull thousands of young people out of classrooms and push them into systems of juvenile and adult criminal justice.

  • D.S., 17, an African-American student at Stall High School in Charleston, who has learning disabilities and a heart condition, was charged as an adult with “disturbing schools” after a minor physical altercation. In the adult criminal justice system, she faced possible detention because of her inability to pay fines and fees.
  • S.P., 15, a white student with behavioral and emotional disabilities at Travelers Rest High School in Greenville, was charged with “disorderly conduct” after failing to comply with instructions to leave the school library and cursing at a student who was making fun of her.
  • K.B., 15, a Latina student from Charleston, was charged with “disturbing schools” after she got upset over having to pick up a tardy slip when she was late for gym class. After her complaints drew the attention of others in the hallway, she was thrown to the ground, handcuffed, and arrested.
  • D.D., an African-American student in Charleston who has struggled with homelessness, was charged with “disturbing schools” after talking to another student after she was sent out of class.  She has subsequently spent two years languishing in a computer-based education program that is not designed to lead to a high school diploma.

For Niya, the courage to speak up against what she knew to be wrong came with a price. She is being treated like a criminal. Ben Fields lost his job, but Niya is still facing charges.

Anxious and fearful about going back to school, days after the arrest, Niya dropped out and enrolled in a GED program.

Niya’s arrest had serious consequences for her. Children should not be hauled out of school in handcuffs for talking back in class. We will keep fighting school disturbance laws across the country so that kids like Niya can stay in their classrooms and out of the criminal justice system.

Kids should never go to jail for simply acting their age.

Robin Shulman is a Communications Strategist for the ACLU

About The Author

Disclaimer: the views expressed by guest writers are strictly those of the author and may not reflect the views of the Vanguard, its editor, or its editorial board.

Related posts


  1. Biddlin

    When I first saw news coverage of this, I was sitting with my wife, who was squeezing my hand harder and harder as she got madder and madder. The thought of someone treating a child in such a manner made my pacifist wife say,” If that were my child, that man wouldn’t need to wait for a trial.” Does anyone think this taught anyone respect for authority?

    That’s what you get when you hire from the bottom of the barrel.

  2. Tia Will


    Does anyone think this taught anyone respect for authority?”

    I think this is a really profound question. It brings up the issue of what one believes that “respect” for authority should be based on. I believe that respect for authority should be based on the example of exemplary behavior set by that authority and the belief that the authority in question can be trusted to act according to the highest standards. However, we have at least one poster on this blog who has expressed a belief in corporal punishment which I see as nothing more than authority based on fear or a “might makes right” philosophy. Obviously how one views authority and the basis for adherence to such authority will have a major impact on how one views and chooses to act within the world. If the actions of Niya Kenny have been accurately depicted in this article, I would find her actions as having much higher moral authority than those of the involved officer. Standing up for and attempting to defend someone being physically assaulted is not a disruption, but should rather be seen as the moral imperative in this situation.

  3. Davis Progressive

    biddlin: one of the best points i’ve seen made here.  absolutely – if anything, he taught her not to respect authority and certainly not to trust it.

    1. Barack Palin

      She already didn’t respect authority, that’s what started the escalation in the first place.  Yes the officer took it too far and should’ve known better, but let’s not kid anyone that she already had respect for authority.

    2. tribeUSA

      I recall another news article last year (when this event occurred) wherein students were interviewed about officer “Slam”–according to this news article, this particular officer was indeed widely liked and respected; despite what you might think given the “Slam” nickname (apparently no-nonsense but also friendly and personable).

      No question that he was a bit too enthusiastic in carrying out his duties in this particular incident (perhaps attempting to double-down on his “slam” nickname by reputation); as a video of the incident shows. I personally think he should have been reprimanded and had some required training classes to provide alternatives to his “slam” technique; and been given a second chance. He should have known better than to come between a teenage girl and her cellphone; he’s lucky to have made it thru the incident without major injuries.

  4. Napoleon Pig IV

    It seems to me there are two different but related issues here. The first is the misbehavior of the girl on the cell phone and the officer’s over-reaction. He was appropriately fired for that poor judgement. The second issue is how the girl, Niya, who stood up to injustice was treated. This lawsuit is about the second issue, and this one is very important. No law should be written so vaguely as to become a tool for “legal” abuse of power and deliberate miscarriages of justice. The two South Carolina laws targeted by the ACLU should clearly be thrown out. If not, no one will have reason to respect either these laws nor the legal process in general.

    1. Biddlin

      ” The second issue is how the girl, Niya, who stood up to injustice was treated. This lawsuit is about the second issue, and this one is very important. No law should be written so vaguely as to become a tool for “legal” abuse of power and deliberate miscarriages of justice.”


  5. Tia Will


    I completely and belatedly agree. There should never be a punishment for peacefully standing up against an injustice. In my view, it was Niya who demonstrated true leadership here.


Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for