Measure G Campaign Officials, Board Members Discuss Status of Returns, Next Steps

The Vanguard analysis suggests an uphill battle, however, officials are not conceding defeat just yet and some believe there may be reason for optimism.

“There are many ballots yet to be counted,” Board Member Joe DiNunzio told the Vanguard on Wednesday.  “The election is far from decided.”

Joe DiNunzio expressed pride in the work of the campaign.

He said, “I think the campaign committee—made up of committed volunteers that included parents, teachers and staff, and civic leaders—did a fantastic job. I am really proud of the partnership they developed and the level of engagement they had with the community, no matter what the outcome.”

Evan Jacobs similarly added, “The Yes on G campaign is an all-volunteer campaign. Hundreds of people gave their time and energy to educate the community about the wage gap for educators in Davis and how our students and community benefit from paying teachers fairly.”

He, too, was not ready to concede.

He said, “Election day may be over, but there are thousands of ballots left to be counted by Yolo County.  The final results of Measure G are still days away.”

But the reality is that at the end of Tuesday’s results the number of yeses stood at 65.06 percent—with a needed two-thirds majority threshold.  By our analysis the remaining ballots, if they continue at the rate from election day (as opposed to prior to election day), would push the vote to 65.9 percent—just shy of the two-thirds needed.  To get over the two-thirds threshold, assuming 10,000 remaining
votes, it would take a 68.8 percent yes vote percentage in those in order to push the ballot measure to victory.

That is a tall task, as some have at least privately conceded.

Board Member Alan Fernandes, however, remains optimistic.

“In the end, when all votes are counted, I think the trend shows that we’re going to make that extremely high super-majority, two-thirds threshold,” he said.

For Alan Fernandes, the results so far don’t mean that the community is not supporting local public education.

“It doesn’t mean it wasn’t the will of the community that this occur,” he said, noting how high a threshold two-thirds really is.  “It’s not just a majority.  It’s not just a 55 percent requirement in state law.  It’s not even a 60 percent requirement, it’s a super super majority.  It is a standard that is so high that falling within an arm’s distance away, doesn’t indicate it was a will of the community at all.

“I view it as very much the will of the community that our teachers are compensated, and its willingness,” he said.

Instead, he believes “it is a matter of us to educate the public on how state law is situated where they are willing to allow a lower threshold (55 percent) to invest into buildings by a facilities bond, but when it comes to investing into people and programs and education of our kids, for whatever reason, the legislature and the powers that be haven’t caught up to what are the needs of the community.”

Several people the Vanguard spoke to cited a late effort by the opposition, which dropped literature and sent out two text messages late in the campaign attacking the measure.

“There were two texts sent prior to the election that stated an average teacher salary that really misconstrues the actual facts and the breakdown here in Davis,” Alan Fernandes explained, noting there are different salary scales by experience and “we have more experience that other districts.”  He said, “That’s why it appears that the average teacher salary is higher, when we actually just have more teachers that are more experienced than others.

“When you compare apples to apples, it’s clear that our teachers are at best at those high salary scales even, but in all other salary positions disadvantaged,” he said.

“The No campaign leveraged a position and caused enough doubt—irrespective of fact—that would have made a difference if we end up failing,” Alan Fernandes stated.

There are also those who believe we may be at or approaching the limit as to what the community is willing to support in terms of taxes for education.

Alan Fernandes doesn’t agree.  “I think, unfortunately, we had a mischaracterization of the facts.”  That, he said, “created enough doubt in voters’ minds to potentially barely miss the threshold.”

He thinks, with an honest discussion, the community would have supported the district at a sufficient level.

The question is where does the district go from here.

For Joe DiNunzio, “now is not the time to speculate on what might come next. Let’s count all the votes and see where we are.”

Board President Cindy Pickett told the Vanguard, “The District’s ability to attract and retain high quality teachers remains a priority for the Board.”

She added, “We are watching the election returns closely and are hopeful that Measure G will pass. However, the Board is prepared to explore other options for improving teacher compensation should Measure G fail.”

—David M. Greenwald reporting

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for

About The Author

David Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

Related posts


  1. Bill Marshall

    Well, I could support going to 60%, but only with no exemptions.

    55% , with exemptions, is a non-starter, for me…

    Fernandes is advocating a “gimme” (or gimmick) to get $$$, until repealed, and requiring a 50%+1 to repeal.

    DJUSD has not been transparent nor honest in the campaign for this measure… the organized opponents have likewise been less than transparent, and dishonest in their arguments…

    Where is Diogenes these days?

    1. Bill Marshall

      One off the top of my head… they said “no worries” about the inflator and “good until repealed”, without being honest about what %-age would be needed to repeal, and the likelihood that that bar might not be realistic to achieve… the way this was structured, there is a miniscule chance it would be repealed.  In my opinion, they should have just said, “this is how it will be, until pandas look like ostriches”… that would have been more honest…

      The reality is that 100% of City precincts voted in favor, tho’, as Matt shows, relatively few were in favor @ the 2/3 level…

      My opinion.  Hope that answers your question…

      1. Matt Williams

        For those who didn’t see the precinct by precinct data yesterday.  Here it is again … provided in two sorts..  The sort to the left is by geography working from southeast to northwest.  The sort to the right is by percentage of Yes votes.  The color coding from red to orange to white to green to blue represents the ascending order of percentage of Yes votes from a low of 17.6% to a high of 79.5%.

        The white green and blue precincts were in favor @ the 2/3 level, which is 22 out of the 42 total precincts.

  2. Alan Miller

    Maybe if we all sit quietly in our homes from 6pm to 7pm this evening and all think the same thought, “I really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really want Measure G to PASS!” — maybe the universe will change some of the votes and it will come to be.   Ok, got it everyone?  6pm.  Prayers, black magic, Measure G.  Y’all ready to rock this, people?  Let’s go!  Click your heels together, Dorothy!!!

    1. Bill Marshall

      will change some of the votes and it will come to be.

      No the votes won’t change… but given VBM (many of which were dropped off, or mailed, Tuesday), Conditional, and Provisional, a lot of votes (we had high %-ages of those 3, in our precinct) have not been counted… big diff..

      Remains to be seen if there is going to be any changes in outcomes… yet, this election was weird… normally, late votes parallel early votes… this year, with same day registration, addition of “conditional voting”, this is not a ‘normal’ year… I’d not bet money, one way or the other, as to what happens between now and the canvass…

      1. Bill Marshall

        I understood Alan … what I posted was for those who didn’t

        Many are deluded that the results will change… many are deluded that they will not, with certainty

        As for me, ‘it is what it is’… it would not surprise me if the end results are the same, it also would not surprise me if it changes, on this Measure.  And, frankly (although I’m not), it matters not to me… it is what it is…

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for