Man with Mental Health History Set for Trial after He Allegedly Threatens Wife, Talks to Dead Relatives

Share:

By Michelle Luu and Dario McCarty

WOODLAND, CA — Despite the best efforts of his public defender and the wishes of the victim, a Yolo County man, who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia, was set to stand trial here in Yolo County Superior Court on a felony charge of criminal threats against his spouse.

On June 4, Derek Calvin allegedly began acting erratically in his shared West Sacramento home with his spouse. During the hearing, Calvin’s spouse had to collect herself as she recalled how the episode began. After Calvin had accused her of taking his phone, he had come downstairs and began shouting at her.

After his outburst, she stated that Calvin began running back and forth in the house, jumping up and down, and growling. He then started to tear up the kitchen, and it was at this point that Calvin grabbed a five-inch steak knife from the kitchen and tucked it into his pocket.

According to his spouse’s testimony, Calvin began to then make threatening statements. “Where I’m from, we take people and put them in the meat grinder. We kill all of y’all! We kill people like that,” she testified Calvin said. At one point, Calvin said that he had friends from Richmond who could beat her up.

Calvin’s erratic behavior was likely caused by a mental health breakdown, as described by his defense attorney. According to his spouse’s testimony, Calvin had mental health issues and had been diagnosed with schizophrenia.

His spouse testified that, at one point, Calvin began hallucinating and speaking to one of his deceased family members. Calvin would also, at various points during the episode, interrupt his threats to say, “I’m sorry, I didn’t mean that,” and give her a kiss on the cheek before then returning to his violent outburst.

But despite these threats, Calvin’s spouse stated several times that these were not what had made her afraid. “I wasn’t afraid of the statements,” she said. “I was afraid of what I had seen him become.” Calvin’s spouse went on to further clarify that it was, specifically, Calvin’s erratic behavior that scared her.

In fact, Calvin’s spouse was reluctant to call the police in the first place. This was due to prior experiences where, after Calvin and she had had a prior fight, the police had ended up arresting her.

“The thing is that when [the police] come they take me to jail, so it was like my hands were tied…” said Calvin’s spouse. “They always take me to jail, so majority of the time I try to deal with it because I don’t wanna go to jail and lose my job.”

At the end of the preliminary hearing, Deputy Public Defender Teal Dixon petitioned the court to grant a PC § 17(b) motion which would reduce the felony charge to a misdemeanor on the basis of his mental health and the fact that the witness did not feel fear over Calvin’s words.

“The issue here is not whether he acted in a way that scared her…but whether he committed the crime of a criminal threat, which includes that he intended for her to feel fear and that she did feel fear…she did not feel that he was going to call people from Richmond to come and get her,” Ms. Dixon said to the court.

“She was afraid…of his change in temperament, the way he was acting, the strange growling… She was afraid of the totality,” the PD added.

Dixon is referring to the California law that states that felony criminal threats are those done with the specific intent that the statement is to be taken as a threat and would cause the victim to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety. According to Dixon, these conditions were not met. “At no point did I hear [Mr. Calvin’s spouse] say, ‘I’m afraid he’s going to execute that threat,’” said Dixon.

However, Deputy District Attorney David Wilson disagreed, citing the statements Calvin’s spouse gave to an officer that that she “‘thought it was [her] time.’

“I think this is felony conduct,” said Wilson. “He is threatening to bring in other people to harm the victim, and there’s evidence before the court that…she was afraid this incident on June 4 would go further because of threats made on a prior domestic incident.”

Further, Wilson argued that if the appropriate resolution for this case was mental health treatment, he did not believe that reducing from a felony to a misdemeanor at this point in time would have expedited or bettered that process.

Ultimately, Judge David Rosenberg sided with DDA Wilson, agreeing that there was sufficient evidence for Calvin to stand trial on the charge of felony criminal threats.

In response to the question of the defendant’s mental health, Judge Rosenberg said, “It’s pretty clear to the court that Mr. Calvin has suffered some mental health issues and needs to get some mental health help. That can be provided to him through the justice system.”

Judge Rosenberg’s decision is in spite of the fact that Calvin’s spouse had asserted in her testimony that she did not want to see Calvin face charges, and instead just wanted to see him receive mental health treatment.

Attorney Dixon’s 17(b) motion was denied without prejudice and Derek Calvin’s arraignment is currently scheduled for July 9.

Michelle is a fourth year at U.C. Davis majoring in English and Communications with a minor in Professional Writing. She has an interest in the occurrences of injustice and discrimination in today’s legal system.

Dario McCarty is a rising junior at UC Berkeley studying Political Economy and English. He is a Bay Area native and is passionate about criminal justice reform.


To sign up for our new newsletter – Everyday Injustice – https://tinyurl.com/yyultcf9

Support our work – to become a sustaining at $5 – $10- $25 per month hit the link:

Share:

About The Author

Related posts

4 thoughts on “Man with Mental Health History Set for Trial after He Allegedly Threatens Wife, Talks to Dead Relatives”

  1. Robert Canning

    Judge Rosenberg’s comment that mental health help “can be provided to him through the justice system” speaks to the ignorance that certain parts of the criminal justice system have for the realities of the “help” it can provide. It is so absurd that the judge would say this. Someone who suffers from schizophrenia needs treatment in a clinical treatment center – possibly a hospital – rather than a possible jail/prison sentence. This is so sad.

    1. Bill Marshall

      Someone who suffers from schizophrenia needs treatment in a clinical treatment center – possibly a hospital – rather than a possible jail/prison sentence.

      That would take a willing patient, financial resources, absent Court action, right?  Meant as honest question…

      1. Robert Canning

        Good question Bill. In many situations someone who is acutely psychotic, like this gentleman, could be treated as an outpatient with medication and frequent visits. It really depends on his acuity. If he is too sick to function in the community he could be evaluated for a few days or a couple weeks in an inpatient unit and then released to community programs. The justice system does not provide good treatment for individuals with severe mental illness. In the jail he might be confined to a single cell for most of the day and maybe see a psychiatrist once every 90 days and a social worker once a month – it depends on the system used by the jail. In Yolo County the provider is a company called Wellpath which provides mental health (and medical) care to many jail inmates in California – from big jails like San Diego to small jails like ours. Once he is arraigned he might there might be an objection that he cannot work with his attorney because of his mental illness and then he would get referred for an evaluation.

        If he were living in the community and getting services it would most likely be through the county HHS and the cost is covered by MediCal. There is also mental health court but I am not sure what the current criteria are for this program. Unfortunately in Yolo County the mental health court is only open to those who have been found guilty. (It’s been a while since I looked at the program so it may have changed but I don’t think so.) The special court can help manage his care and depending on the charges they could be expunged at the end of the process.

        1. Bill Marshall

          Thank you for the elaboration… I appreciate it…

          From what I’ve seen working with County HHS (trying to assist a homeless gent who had a ‘constellation’ of issues, all arguably inter-related, HHS has significant/severe limitations on resources… seems to be a ‘between a rock and a hard place’ thing… or, under existing funding/services, “you can’t get there from here”…

          This is so sad.

          Absolutely agree… seems to stress the need for ‘early identification’ and ‘early intervention’… not always possible…

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for