Six Men on Oklahoma Death Row File Injunctions to Halt Executions on Basis of Being Required to Choose Own Execution Method

Share:
Photo by Nate Billings, The Oklahoman

By Amy Fullerton and Casey Rawlings

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK – As of late October 2021, six men incarcerated in Oklahoma on death row are in the process of filing injunctions to halt their upcoming executions in protest of being required to choose their own execution method.

The hearing, however, isn’t scheduled until after all of their execution dates.

The men on Oklahoma’s death row claim that it is against their religious beliefs to have to choose their own death sentence and hope the federal district court will halt their executions.

One of the people incarcerated, John Grant, is scheduled to be the first execution in Oklahoma in six years – he is scheduled to be killed on Oct. 28, 2021 if the injunction is not granted.

The plaintiffs argue that it would be against their religious beliefs if they were to participate in an execution. They believe that choosing their execution method “demonstrates a hostility towards religion generally,” forcing them to “either violate their sincerely held religious beliefs or face imminent execution.”

Oklahoma has had a rocky past with how the state has proceeded with capital punishment. A common three-drug combination has been used to execute people, which has included the sedative midazolam, a paralytic, and potassium chloride.

In recent years, however, Oklahoma has swapped potassium chloride with potassium acetate, leading to faulty executions that has left people on death row writhing in pain in their last moments on earth.

Additionally, faulty procedural techniques, such as injecting the drugs into tissue instead of the bloodstream, and the use of paralytics has been a widely controversial aspect of death row executions.

Injection into tissue instead of into the bloodstream prolongs the time it takes for people to die and the use of paralytics is primarily used to mask the pain and suffering they feel during the execution process.

Botched executions, including the botched execution of Clayton Lockett in 2014 and Charles Warner in 2015 due to the misuse of the three-drug combination, add to evidence that incarcerated men on Oklahoma death row are hoping to use in their argument for a halt to their executions.

Many advocates for men like Grant argue against the death penalty as a whole, citing many different reasons, the primary of which being that it violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

Another reason provided by advocates against capital punishment is a primary concern of death penalty advocates; money. Supporters of capital punishment frequently stipulate that it is more economically feasible than other options; however, advocates against it say this isn’t true.

According to a recent study conducted by Amnesty International, median death penalty cases cost $1.26 million tax dollars each year, whereas non-death penalty cases through the end of incarceration average around $740,000 per case.

Activists supporting Grant cite the argument that the death penalty does not effectively deter crime, and law enforcement recently reported that more efficient deterrence includes; increasing police officers, reducing drug abuse, and creating a better economy with more jobs.

Lastly, advocates refer to the number of known innocent people sentenced to death; last year, at least one person was exonerated for every 10 that were executed. For example, there is one currently known innocent man incarcerated on death row in Oklahoma – Julius Jones.

Despite maintaining his innocence for 19 years, his case containing clear evidence of contamination and racism, and compelling evidence that he was wrongfully convicted, Jones is set to be executed by Governor Kevin Stitt and the State of Oklahoma on the 18th of November.

Attorney General John O’Connor, ruled unqualified by the American Bar Association, refused to call off executions that are scheduled before the date of the trial case, leaving men like Grant and Jones abandoned.

The district court will be holding a hearing on the preliminary injunction motion Monday, Oct. 25, while Grant is scheduled to be executed three days later.

The hearing for the case isn’t set until February of 2022, regarding the constitutional rights of Grant, Jones, Bigler Stouffer, Wade Lay, Donald Grant, and Gilbert Postelle – all but two are men of color, and of them scheduled to be executed before the hearing.

Share:

About The Author

Amy is a junior at UCSB triple majoring in Psychology and Brain Sciences, Communication, and Political Science. She is from Redwood City, California.

Related posts

4 thoughts on “Six Men on Oklahoma Death Row File Injunctions to Halt Executions on Basis of Being Required to Choose Own Execution Method”

    1. Dudley Sharp

      Amy and casey write:

      ” the use of paralytics is primarily used to mask the pain and suffering they feel during the execution process.’

      That has, never, been the purpose of the paralytic.

      Spasms and movements have, always, been a side effect of drug overdoses, which is what a lehtal injection execution is. The paralytic is, strictly, for those witnessing the execution, , not the murderer executed.

      The first drug is given in a massive overdose, rendering the murderer unconscious, so no pain felt. The paralytic, also, hastens death, as it stops breathing.

      The first drug doesn’t decided, on its own, to all of a sudden, magically, stop working.

      A simple pharmacolgy review will confirm this. Basic.

       

       

       

       

       

       

      1. Dudley Sharp

        There is no disputing that Oklahoma has been, grossly, irresponsible within two executions.

        The pain of Lockett is disputed as his brain was saturated with all three drugs.

        “Four (witnesses) reported that Lockett did not move, one reported he moved slightly and the last recalled a more aggressive movement.” The Execution of Clayton D. Lockett, Case Number 14-0189SI,  OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
        https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/3/4b/34bfaec3-377d-584f-bbfe-9c280b77e769/5507113dc9d9b.pdf.pdf

  1. Dudley Sharp

    Jones is not known to be actually innocent, otherwise he have been released. It appears to simply be another wildly successful duping of followers, as like Troy Davis and so many others.

    Jones has been recommended for commutation for life, by the parole board. An additional hearing will be held.

    Nationally, there is about 1 proven actually  innocent on death row, as determined by the authorized governmental authority, out of 250 so sentenced, and they have been identified and released..

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for