Decarcerate Sac, Allies Announce News Conference to Denounce Sacramento Jail Expansion

By Cres Vellucci

Vanguard Sacramento Bureau Chief

SACRAMENTO, CA – Community groups continue to line up opposing a nearly half billion dollar jail expansion coming up for a vote before the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors next week—the fourth time in about three years the board is considering a Sacramento County jail expansion.

This time, Decarcerate Sacramento issued a statement to reiterate its opposition to the jail construction, and announce a new conference this Monday with other opponents to explain why.

See more detailed opposition:

Decarcerate Sac said on Friday that the “proposal for an additional annex building to the downtown jail was originally canceled by the Board of Supervisors on March 10, 2021 following months of community outcry. Concerns included the unsustainable cost of expanding a broken system, and the need for community-based services that prevent incarceration.” 

Opponents to the construction charge county staff “claim the new building is necessary to meet the Mays v. Sacramento federal consent decree requirements, particularly ADA and HIPAA compliance.” 

But decarceration advocates refer to continuing jail failures, including court-appointed expert monitoring reports and the failure by the jail to make simple improvements possible in the current facility, like “additional privacy booths for intake nurses, utilizing white noise machines, and keeping sheriffs out of the room when patients are being interviewed.”

“Most of the conditions issues are caused by jail staff behavior. New buildings will not guarantee better conditions, but reducing staff-patient ratios and enforcing current policies to treat people humanely will,” said Liz Blum, a co-founder of Decarcerate Sacramento. “All parties involved have acknowledged that an overpopulated jail is at the core of this crisis.”

Currently, Blum and others maintain, 83 percent of the jail is “pretrial status awaiting court, and 62 percent have diagnosed mental illness. Over half of those booked into the jail are released within three days.”

The county released its first series of “jail population reduction plans” last montha move community criminal justice reform advocates note is “a step in the right direction” but also criticize, arguing it lacks “meaningful commitments, measurements for accountability and an implementation strategy.” 

“We need reentry support. We need housing. We need mental health support for people exiting the jail,” said Katie Valenzuela, Sacramento City Councilmember for District 4, which includes downtown Sacramento. “From a practical perspective, you can’t really do both. If you’re going to invest hundreds of millions into a jail facility, you won’t have the resources.”

About The Author

Disclaimer: the views expressed by guest writers are strictly those of the author and may not reflect the views of the Vanguard, its editor, or its editorial board.

Related posts

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for