Davis voters are slated to consider Measure W in the forthcoming November election, a ballot proposition designed to amend the city’s General Plan for the purpose of authorizing the construction of the 1,250-home Willowgrove community.
According to the latest unofficial results released by Yolo County, Measure V, a ballot initiative proposing the Village Farms development north of Covell Boulevard, appears to have been defeated. The measure, which sought to amend the city’s General Plan to allow up to 1,800 housing units on agricultural land, garnered 11,181 votes in favor against 11,451 opposed, resulting in a 270-vote deficit. This outcome, with a 1.2 percentage point gap, marks another defeat for a peripheral-growth housing proposal under Davis’ Measure J framework, despite being one of the closest such contests in the city’s history.
Measure V has incrementally reduced its deficit in the ongoing Yolo County election count, narrowing the gap to 416 votes in the latest update. However, the proposed Village Farms development initiative requires approximately 52.6 percent of the estimated 8,000 outstanding ballots to secure passage, a threshold exceeding its recent performance.
Measure V, a voter referendum concerning the proposed Village Farms development in north Davis, remained narrowly behind in early election returns, according to the latest update from Yolo County election officials. With thousands of ballots yet to be processed, the outcome remains uncertain for the measure, which seeks voter approval for a residential community of up to 1,800 housing units on approximately 498 acres of agricultural land.
The Village Farms project, a proposed 1,800-unit residential development spanning 498 acres in Davis, California, has drawn scrutiny over its potential implications for traffic, housing affordability, and environmental safety. Opponents contend the development, situated near a 200-acre FEMA floodplain and adjacent to a former landfill, would exacerbate congestion with an estimated 15,000 daily car trips and fail to provide adequate affordable housing, prompting calls for its reconsideration.
Mutual Housing of California received an $8.4 million subsidy from the City of Davis for the 69-unit New Harmony affordable housing project. Applying this per-unit subsidy rate indicates that a 360-unit development, such as the proposed Village Farms, would necessitate a city contribution of approximately $44 million. This financial projection contrasts with Mutual Housing’s assertion that the Village Farms project can be realized with a $6 million developer investment.
The Davis Joint Unified School District is weighing the closure of two elementary schools and potentially a junior high school, a measure prompted by significant declines in student enrollment. District officials attribute this trend to falling birth rates and the area’s high housing costs, which has implications for state funding tied to student numbers.
A Davis educator has publicly stated her inclusion on an endorsement list for ‘Yes on Measure V (Village Farms)’ occurred without her knowledge or authorization. The individual has consistently opposed the proposed development, citing specific concerns related to potential environmental health hazards and the project’s failure to adequately address affordable housing requirements.
The Davis Teachers Association formally endorsed Measure V, asserting that a deficiency in housing development within Davis is contributing to declining school enrollment, impeding access for working families, and posing a risk to the sustained health of the community’s public education infrastructure.
Measure V, a ballot initiative in Davis, California, is presented as a strategy to enhance community accessibility and attainability for families, building upon the city’s established reputation as a desirable location for family rearing. Advocates contend that the measure would concurrently stimulate economic vitality, thereby fostering a healthy and resilient local economy.
Councilmember Linda Deos endorsed the Village Farms Davis project, though questions persist regarding the developer’s definitive commitments to grade-separated crossings and the preservation of a 47-acre alkali playa wetland habitat. Initial project proposals indicated conditional participation in funding grade-separated infrastructure and planned residential development within the wetland area, despite historical evidence documenting its ecological significance. Subsequent project revisions, influenced by planning commission directives and biological assessments, incorporated these features, yet provisions within the development agreement suggest potential mechanisms for the developer to mitigate financial responsibility for these elements.
The Davis City Council member supports Measure V, a housing development project that includes infrastructure improvements, affordable housing commitments, and environmental stewardship, which has undergone rigorous public scrutiny and is backed by legally binding commitments to ensure the project remains true to its promises.
Judy Ennis, founder of the Davis Community Action Network, has announced her candidacy for the District 1 seat on the Davis City Council in the November 2026 election, focusing on housing affordability, economic resilience, climate preparedness, public services and rebuilding trust between residents and local government.
Measure V (Village Farms) is a long-term project that is being falsely marketed as a solution to current school closures, and is actually a risky, developer-driven project with potential traffic, toxic, and infrastructure issues.
The Village Farms consortium is attempting to fast track a housing development in Davis, California, despite evidence of toxic groundwater contamination and the presence of endangered species, leading to concerns about the potential health risks to future residents and the environmental impact.
The Village Farms project in Davis has been criticized for its affordable housing strategy, but this criticism is unfounded as land dedication has been a successful model for producing affordable housing in California and Davis, and the project includes additional guarantees to ensure the housing is built.
Davis City Councilmember Bapu Vaitla voted in favor of Village Farms’ affordable housing proposal after the developer made a commitment to build 280 affordable units, 80 moderate-income homes, and 100 units if necessary, as well as dedicating over half of the development’s acreage to parks, greenbelts, habitat, playfields, and urban agriculture.
Village Farms’ plan to build 360 “permanently affordable homes” is misleading, as only 100 of these units may be built in 10 years or more, and the City has not guaranteed that these units will be built.
The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board has endorsed Measure V, a housing proposal in Davis, arguing that it is necessary to address the city’s long-standing housing constraints and growth pressures tied to UC Davis.
Davis Joint Unified School District is facing a long-term enrollment decline due to housing, demographics and fiscal constraints, which could lead to school closures, reduced programming and a need for the city to build more family-oriented housing.