Commentary: Occupy the Water Supply Project
In the last few weeks we have finally seen the outcry from the left that has been muted far too long, based perhaps on their misplaced faith or misplaced admiration for Barack Obama.
In the last few weeks we have finally seen the outcry from the left that has been muted far too long, based perhaps on their misplaced faith or misplaced admiration for Barack Obama.

To put 250 people at an event, an announcement for a candidacy where the election is still eight months away, is an impressive feat. Then again, Dan Wolk probably had about a 20-year head start on the competition. Many, if not most, of the attendees at this event probably have attended Lois Wolk events in the past.
In a bit of irony, Elaine Roberts Musser used her monthly Vanguard column to argue, among other things, “Every expert willing to speak publicly seems to agree we need the surface water project sooner rather than later. All the Davis and Woodland City Council members agree we do need the surface water project.”
As many who read the comment section yesterday figured out, the city’s advertised water rate hikes include an assumption that the residents will conserve an average of 20% of their water. Failing to do this by hook or by crook, the resident could see water rates increase far more than 14% annually.
Reasons to do this project sooner rather than later:

It was supposed to be a simple item that moved forward the Fifth Street Corridor Improvement project. Council simply recommended adoption of a negative declaration which would analyze the proposed project and determine that the potential impacts would be less than significant, with mitigation, while at the same time amending the Core Area Specific Plan for consistency with the Fifth Street Corridor Improvements Project. This would include an Implementation Measure to add bicycle lanes on Fifth Street/Russell Boulevard from A to L Streets.
While we have, up until this point, focused on Veolia’s role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, perhaps the bigger problem that Veolia should face in gaining a contract with the Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency should be their handling of water issues in this state.
Violations, High Cost, Poor Performance Leads Eight Other Municipalities in the Last Decade to Prematurely Terminate Contract with United WaterThe questions about one of the contractors under consideration, United Water, associated with the CDM “team,” have been raised, both in public and by members of the Clean Water Agency.
Councilmember Stephen Souza does not get it right now. In fact, he does not get it on a number of fronts, which could prove harmful to him if he indeed chooses to run for reelection. Picking a fight with Bob Dunning is probably one of the worst decisions any one in Davis public office can make.
As we presented two weeks ago, Davis has been thrust into an unenviable bind by the creation of the water project – the choice, perhaps, between doing business with evil large companies and higher water rates.

It has been just about nine months since Dan Wolk was appointed by the Davis City Council to replace Don Saylor. He has become a critical third vote on the budget, and the architect of a compromise that might have averted the current water referendum had his colleagues taken the lead.

The latest revelations of the Davis firefighters taking out their anger at the Vanguard on a struggling local business, Westlake Market, is a reminder of a much larger issue – that of a pattern of abuse of union power and misconduct on the part of the Davis firefighters.

On Saturday during Farmer’s Market, a small group of mostly young people walked through the crowd – these were Occupy Davis protestors.

Earlier this week, I defended Councilmember Stephen Souza from charges of “blocking” – preventing those who wished to sign petitions from doing so. However, in the last few days we have had reports that Mr. Souza may have been a bit too zealous in defending his cause.

Earlier this week, the Vanguard covered the counter-protest, if you will, those residents of Davis who are opposing the referendum. Yesterday the Davis Enterprise reported that that group of residents includes Kemble Pope, Alan Pryor, Kari Fry and Tom Cross – and ironically makes little mention of Councilmember Stephen Souza, who at least appears to be spearheading the movement.
It sounds good, the simple notion of pitting students and water against each other. After all, in the ideal world we should just decide every project, every expenditure, every law on its own individual merits.
Whatever side one comes down on in the water battle that has been increasing in this community, as supporters of a possible referendum have two weeks left to get the necessary citizen signatures, the need arises for a fully transparent process.
The Clean Water Agency (CWA) had a special meeting to continue the discussion from two weeks ago about two key elements of the Design-Build-Operate process that is paramount to making the water project as affordable as possible.
I am certain that the art community is not going to appreciate my views on this matter and that is fine. I have been on the fence about the water tank art project. On the one hand, I have argued that in these tough times, we ought to stop doing business as usual.
It would be perhaps fitting if the Davis firefighters, for the last several years the symbol of failed fiscal restraint in the City of Davis and really across the state and the nation, represented the undoing of Davis’ budget hopes.