Yolo County

Former Candidate For Judge Takes Deputy DA Position in Tuolumne County

parish-clintWhen Clinton Parish, a Deputy DA in the Yolo County District Attorney’s office, announced just over a year ago that he intended to challenge Judge Dan Maguire for his judicial position, he did so with the full backing of his boss, District Attorney Jeff Reisig.

However, when he mailed attack brochures to county residents that proved to have unverified accusations against the judge, many of Mr. Parish’s backers, including Yolo County Sheriff Ed Prieto and DA Reisig, quickly withdrew their support.

What Does Narrow Loss of Prop 34 Mean for Death Penalty in California?

death-penalty-presser-1In the immediate aftermath of the loss of Proposition 34, the ballot measure that would have ended California’s death penalty and replaced it with life without parole, its ballot sponsors took solace in the relative closeness of the election.

“The mere fact that the state is evenly divided is nothing short of extraordinary. In 1978, 71% of the electorate supported the Briggs Death Penalty Initiative and now, after hearing the facts, voters are almost evenly split,” said Jeanne Woodford, the official proponent of the SAFE California Campaign and former Warden at San Quentin State Prison where she oversaw four executions.

Today’s Vote on Prop 34 Looms Large in Latest Local Death Penalty Case

death-penalty-presser-1Yesterday in Sacramento County, a jury deliberating for less than a day found Richard Hirschfield guilty of the kidnapping and killing of two UC Davis students on December 20, 1980.

This case has had a lot of twists and turns.  In 1993 the Yolo County DA at the time, David Henderson, dropped the charges against four people charged with the killings as a DNA test of a semen sample taken from a blanket in John Riggins’ van didn’t match any of the defendants.

Supervisor McGowan Calls Realignment a Success

McGowan-Mike-WS

GUEST COMMENTARY – Californians seem to like their local governments. In fact, the recently released report from the Public Policy Institute of California suggests that voters have strong confidence in their local governments and want more authority shifted to the local level. Not surprisingly, this is precisely the thinking behind public safety realignment, a historic change to California’s public safety system.

Governor Brown calls this the “principle of subsidiarity.” When something needs to get done, give it to the smallest, least centralized organization that has the ability to do it. That is essentially what is happening with many public safety functions.

Is Prop 34 Poised to Pull Off the Improbable Victory?

death-penalty-presser-1Proposition 34 Still Polling Under 50% But Support Surges – Last week an LA Times poll showed that Proposition 34, which would convert the death penalty in the state of California to life without parole, had pulled within the statistical margin of victory – demonstrating huge gains in a week.

Now the Field Poll, widely regarded as the most accurate of state polls, shows the unthinkable – that Proposition 34 has a lead outside of the margin of error.

Yolo County Sheriff Prieto Sued For Sexual Harassment

Sheriff-PrietoFor the second time this year, Yolo County Sheriff Ed Prieto finds himself the subject of a lawsuit from one of his employees. Victoria Zetwick, a 24-year veteran sheriff’s deputy working as a correctional officer, claims that over the course of 14 years (which dates back to Ed Prieto’s election in 1998, first becoming Yolo County’s Sheriff), she was subjected to sexual harassment which allegedly included “unwanted hugging and kissing.”

Ms. Zetwick, 48, is married to a sheriff’s deputy, as well.  She claims in her suit that she saw Sheriff Prieto “hug and kiss several dozen female employees.”  When present with both male and female employees, Sheriff Prieto, according to the suit, would hug the female employee but give a handshake to the male employee.

Poll Shows Real Opportunity for California to End the Death Penalty

death-penalty-presser-1Same Poll Finds Three Strikes Reform Passing Overwhelmingly – Last week, the LA Times-USC Poll found that support by voters to repeal the death penalty has increased dramatically, which puts the measure in range, though not enough at this point to actually ensure its passage, as support still falls below the critical 50 percent threshold.

The gap is just three points – 42 percent in favor of its passage (which would end the death penalty) and 45 percent against, with a critical 12 percent undecided.

Why Conservatives Like Bill O’Reilly and Me Support Proposition 34

Briggs-Ron

by Ron Briggs

GUEST COMMENTARY – Bill O’Reilly is the newest endorser of Proposition 34, the initiative that will replace the death penalty with life in prison without possibility of parole and make inmates work and pay restitution (rather than sit in private cells without doing anything, as they now do).

It might be surprising to some that O’Reilly, a political commentator on Fox News, a national leader among traditional thinkers, supports Prop 34. But a look at California’s death penalty shows why: California’s death penalty is simply a fiscal disaster that coddles criminals, enriches lawyers, and hurts victims.

California Leads the Nation in Wrongful Convictions

prison-reformThe first ever academic investigation into the scope and cost of wrongful convictions revealed on Wednesday that California leads the nation in wrongful convictions.

The project, California Wrongful Convictions Project, launched by the University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Berkeley Law), and Hollway Advisory Services, a criminal justice research firm, announced that their research found that at least 200 wrongful convictions have been thrown out since 1989 in California, costing those convicted more than 1,300 years of freedom and taxpayers $129 million.

Jury Acquits the Officers in Gutierrez Case of Wrongdoing and Liability

img_3299.jpgANALYSIS – Throughout the trial that seemed to stretch on far longer than the 13 calendar days it encompassed, the hope was that, win or lose, this trial would provide closure to the grieving family of Luis Gutierrez who was gunned down by plain-clothed sheriff’s deputies on April 30, 2009.

The odds from the start seemed stacked against the plaintiffs. After all, they had only three witnesses who actually saw what happened that day and none of them saw everything.  How were they going to prove this case, even at the lower civil trial level of preponderance of the evidence?

Did Deputies Plant the Knife in the Gutierrez Incident?

img_3299.jpgANALYSIS – As the Federal Civil Rights Suit trial wrapped up last week, the Sacramento Bee‘s Denny Walsh does an exceptional piece in which he argues “jurors must ask: What about the knife?

As Mr. Walsh writes, “The jury’s verdict likely will swing on whether the plaintiffs’ lawyers have sown enough doubt in jurors’ minds that Gutierrez did not have the knife when the shooting occurred.”

Gutierrez Trial Goes to the Jury After Three Weeks of Testimony

img_3299.jpgAfter nearly three weeks of trial, the federal civil rights trial on the shooting death of Luis Gutierrez finally closed this week.  In the coming days, the Vanguard will analyze critical portions of the testimony and what we learned.  We begin with the closing statements, which represent how the attorneys on both sides view the evidence as it came out in the case.

Unlike in a criminal trial, the burden of proof is at the level of preponderance of the evidence – that means that the plaintiffs in this case, the family of Mr. Gutierrez, only need a 51% belief that police acted unlawfully.

Yes on Measure H

auditBy Jim Provenza and Don Saylor

GUEST COMMENTARY – Measure H will increase efficiency and accountability within Yolo County by providing an effective financial system.

Measure H was placed on the ballot by a 5-0 vote of the Yolo County Board of Supervisors and is supported by the Mayors of all four Yolo County cities. This measure proposes to consolidate the offices of Auditor-Controller/Tax Collector-Treasurer and other countywide fiscal functions under a Department of Finance by establishing an appointed Director of Finance, creating an independent finance oversight committee, and requiring an annual independent audit of the Department of Finance.

Yolo County Grand Jury Report Uncovers a Troubling Contract and Questionable Ethics in Probation Department

probation-departmentDid Chief Probation Officer Rist Resign Due to This Scandal? – In response to a citizen’s complaint, the Yolo County Grand Jury investigated the Yolo County Probation Department.

The Probation Department had a contract for risk assessment software and training to use in determining the risk of re-offense by clients. The contract is with Assessments.com (ADC). The Grand Jury found that a high-level YCPD manager was the sole contract administrator for the contract and had a personal relationship with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of ADC.

My View: Being Poor Means Inhuman Treatment

Gonzales-building-WoodlandEvery year in June, Assemblymember Mariko Yamada takes what she calls the “Hunger Challenge.”  According to a press release from back in June, “Hunger Challenge participants pledge to live for one week on the nation’s average weekly food stamp benefit of $4.46 per day, or just $1.49 per meal.”

“The challenge is a reminder to me that for millions of Americans, hunger is a daily reality,” said Assemblymember Yamada.  “While I struggle for only a week, far too many who cannot make ends meet face going hungry every day.  Those living in ‘food deserts’ – often students, the disabled, and seniors – are particularly affected.”

Measure H Eliminates the Elected Office of Auditor/Controller & Treasurer/Tax Collector

auditBy Thomas Randall, Jr

GUEST COMMENTARY – On Tuesday, November 6th Yolo County voters will have the choice to vote to pass county wide ballot Measure H or not. The voters should vote no and defeat Measure H for these reasons:

Keeping the combined elective office of Auditor/Controller and Treasurer/Tax Collector with its elective status is essential to provide for an autonomous independent working relationship between that office and the Board of Supervisors. Voting in the option to make this office an appointed office by the Board of Supervisors instead of an elected office is a terrible option for the taxpayers and voters of Yolo County because that office holder would no longer work directly and be accountable to the voters anymore, but work directly for the membership of the Board of Supervisors that appointed that person to the office.

Facing Third Strike, Yolo County Defendant Cops Plea to Questionable Charges

prison-reformJimmy Ducote is probably not the most sympathetic of all figures.  He has sat in custody for nearly three years for an arrest that occurred on December 23, 2009.  A good deal of that is his own doing, as in September he was unsuccessful for the third time in attempting to dismiss his legal counsel, Public Defender Tracie Olson.

Mr. Ducote was facing 50 years to life in a case that remains highly questionable.  He is charged with a Penal Code section 245(c), “Assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury and assault with a deadly weapon other than a firearm upon a peace officer” and evading a peace officer in violation of Vehicle Code section 2800.2(a).

Expert Witness Questions Police Stop in Gutierrez Case

img_3299.jpg

One of the critical questions regarding the propriety of the shooting of Luis Gutierrez on April 30, 2009 by three Yolo County Sheriff’s Deputies is the propriety of the consensual stop and encounter.  One of the persistent questions we have had is whether Mr. Gutierrez – a non-native English speaker, reasonably knew that he was running from police officers.

To answer some of these questions, the plaintiffs brought in expert Stephen L. D’Arcy, currently a Criminal Justice Department faculty member at Sacramento State and a retired undersheriff of Placer County as recently as 2007.

Judge Orders Matzat to Pay Over 5000 Dollars in Restitution to UC Davis

Matzat-PosterBack in late August, UC Davis student Thomas Matzat pled no contest to having spray painted the word “parasite” at Starbucks on Orchard Road in Davis, in exchange for the Yolo County District Attorney dropping the remainder of four felonies and 15 misdemeanors stemming from a spree of protest-related graffiti, most of which involved the term “parasite.”

It was a probation-only deal with an agreement for no state prison and no jail time.  As part of the terms and conditions, Mr. Matzat’s felony conviction would be reduced to a misdemeanor upon full payment of restitution.  The misdemeanor conviction would then be expunged from his record.