A small group of private attorneys in Sonoma County have been paid over $1.4 million in public funds over seven years to represent children in their parents’ divorce and custody cases, with one attorney, Daniel Beck, collecting over $271,000 of that total.
A judge at the Harbor Justice Center declined to immediately expand a father’s contact with his children, citing the timeline of a protective order despite arguments that the father had made measurable progress in treatment programming.
California’s new SB 1427 law allows married couples to file a joint petition for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, requiring them to resolve major issues in advance and incentivizing mediation to reduce the adversarial and expensive nature of family court proceedings.
Kathleen and Richard, two individuals caught in a decade-long legal battle, were both exploited by divorce attorney Mark Erickson, leading to financial ruin and emotional distress, ultimately resulting in Kathleen’s death and Richard’s continued fight for justice.
A disabled domestic violence survivor is standing up for herself and others by fighting for justice in the face of a judge who ignores case law, denies ADA accommodations, and allows bias to run unchecked in family court.
A man was arrested on a felony charge of criminal contempt for allegedly drinking alcohol and physically assaulting his daughter, and a clerical error was noted on his arrest record, but the judge declined to address it in court and left it up to the accused’s new attorney to resolve.
California parents are forced to pay private monitors hundreds of dollars per visit to see their own children under court-ordered supervision, while the state’s Professional Supervised Visitation system profits from family court dysfunction through secretive business training funded by taxpayers.
A domestic violence survivor is being subjected to legal abuse and retaliation in Santa Clara County, as the court refuses to enforce a binding support order and has held ten hearings on alimony.
A Kentucky father has won a rare victory in the state Court of Appeals after a family court judge was found to have committed a “substantial miscarriage of justice” in a high-stakes custody battle, highlighting the importance of due process and transparency in family court.
Carre Munoz, a caseworker for Colorado’s Child Protective Services, violated due process and destroyed a family by removing their children after a false positive test result caused by over-the-counter medications, and the system has been under fire for years for wrongful child removals and misconduct.
In the recently filed federal lawsuit Atwood v. Ivanova, Wilbrandt, and Budd (Case No. 24cv2235-SBP), Judi B….
She was just a teenager. Her testimony threatened to topple the careers of police officers and…
A federal lawsuit filed in San Jose the week before Christmas takes aim at two attorneys who…
By Elena D. Riveria Empathy is a cornerstone of human connection. It allows us to understand and…
The case of the Crooked Arrow and misinterpretation of telephone symbols to fine an Indigent Party over…
By Elena D. Rivera Golden, Colorado – Clara Wilbrandt, a 64-year-old attorney and mother of three, is…
Tainted Trials, Tarnished Headlines, Stolen Justice Series: Vanguard Reporting Results in Denial of Grant Funding for Sketchy…
By Fred Johnson and Susan Bassi When Christine attends her daughter’s San Jose elementary school graduation next…
By Susan Bassi and Fred Johnson As Santa Clara University law school students looked forward to graduation,…
By Judi Atwood Last week in Colorado, amid the sensational news of an attorney disrobing at a…