Guest Commentary: Not in Our Names – Newsom Turns His Back on Domestic Workers

CC image courtesy of National Domestic Workers Alliance

By Eileen Boris and Jessica Lehman, members of Hand in Hand: The Domestic Employers Network

On Sept. 30, Governor Newsom turned his back on California’s estimated 300,000 privately employed homecare providers, house cleaners, and nannies, when he vetoed Senate Bill 686. Rather than right a historic wrong and end the exclusion of household workers from California’s Occupational Health and Safety Law, Newsom grasped for excuses, leaving the lives and health of this largely immigrant women of color workforce unprotected.

Instead of giving the real reason for his veto, Newsom claimed to be protecting us, domestic employers, especially low income homecare employers. We both employ people in our homes that make our lives possible and we recognize that our homes become workplaces when we hire people to clean them or provide care for us or our families.

For me (Jessica), I’ve been acutely aware of my role as an employer since I moved from my parents’ house at age 18. As a wheelchair user, home attendants are fundamental to my independence, assisting me to get dressed and ready for the day, so I can work and be active in my community. These valuable staff who make my life possible deserve to have a safe work environment. But it’s not always easy to be an employer—SB686 would have given me and other disabled employers needed guidance to set up our homes safely.

I, Eileen, have relied on cleaners for decades, beginning when my son was a toddler and both my spouse and I were starting their careers as professors. I soon discovered I have bad allergies to dust, grass, and other irritants, which improved immensely after the careful and knowledgeable work of house cleaners. I came to understand that their working conditions were my living conditions, and I have a responsibility to make sure those conditions do not put them at risk.

In his veto statement, Governor Newsom stoked employer fears by naming the largest possible Cal/OSHA fines, when the reality is that Cal/OSHA’s existing penalty structure allows for reductions and full waivers based on the severity of the violation, size of the employer, good faith efforts, and violation history of the employer.

Newsom also claimed the bill would subject private employers to the same regulations as business. Yet SB 686 was specifically crafted for employment within the home, and was based on the recommendations by a 2022 Cal/OSHA committee that we both sat on, alongside domestic workers, fellow domestic employers and health experts. The legislation also provided time for Cal/OSHA to integrate those recommendations into industry-specific guidance through their regulatory process.

Ending the exclusion of domestic workers from health and safety protections is the necessary first step to beginning this process.

Further, this bill included a technical assistance fund for low-income domestic employers. It would have provided funds to cover the costs of making our homes safer, such as purchasing masks and gloves, or for larger purchases such as Hoyer lifts for transferring wheelchair users in and out of bed. SB 686 was accompanied by a budget request for this fund for low-income employers, but Newsom himself did not include it in the 2023-2024 budget that he signed in July.

Finally, Newsom’s veto ignores the fact that domestic employers are already liable for any illness or injury that the worker they employ sustains on the job through workers’ compensation requirements. SB 686 would have provided the protections, education and financial assistance to prevent injury and mitigate the costs of employer liability. So, in fact, by signing SB 686, Newsom would have protected domestic employers as well as domestic workers, by giving us the tools we need to make our homes safe for our workers, and, by extension, for ourselves and our families.

By signing SB686, the Governor could have led the nation to redress a legacy of racial discrimination and could have given his fellow domestic employers the resources and guidance we need to keep our valued employees safe from harm. Instead, Governor Newsom used fear mongering and misrepresented the facts in order to create a false justification for his refusal to show care for the health and safety for all of California workers, including those who care for our homes.

Jessica Lehman is an employer of home attendants and the former Executive Director of Senior and Disability Action. Eileen Boris is Hull Professor of Feminist Studies at University of Santa Barbara, and the author with Jennifer Klein of Caring for America: Home Health Workers in the Shadow of the Welfare State.

About The Author

Disclaimer: the views expressed by guest writers are strictly those of the author and may not reflect the views of the Vanguard, its editor, or its editorial board.

Related posts

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for