The following is about a six minute clip from the 9/16/06 Davis City Council Meeting, I invite all to watch this and see exactly what Saylor said to Heystek and then Heystek’s response.
Breaking News
AG Seeks Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Relief against Chino Valley Unified’s Forced Outing Policy
Bill to Strengthen Housing Law Enforcement Advances
State Reaches Agreement with Malibu on Compliance with State’s Housing Element Law
In Light of Arizona’s Abortion Ban, California Legislative Women’s Caucus Proposes Urgency Bill to Aid Abortion Services
More FCI Dublin Advocates Urge Courts, Feds to Consider Incarcerated as Facility Closes
For the Sustenance of Love: An Open Letter to the Indian Dowry Tradition
State Lawmakers Stand with 500+ Formerly Incarcerated People at State Capitol Event
COURT WATCH: Judge Sets $10,000 Cash Bail, Ignores Concerns about Accused Seeking Medical Care, Lack of Resources to Pay Bail
Commentary: How Should the City Engage the Community on Housing?
Taxpayers, Not Cops, Foot the Bill for Civil Rights Suits in City, County of Sacramento
This is cool. The technology itself is intriguing, I see why this is the hot thing.
This is cool. The technology itself is intriguing, I see why this is the hot thing.
This is cool. The technology itself is intriguing, I see why this is the hot thing.
This is cool. The technology itself is intriguing, I see why this is the hot thing.
What needs to be put right next to this piece is the streaming video moment of the Aug 1 council meeting where Souza, Asmundson and Saylor refused Heystek’s request to agendize this issue for discussion, a full 3 months before the Nov. ballot. Their explanation for denial made no sense at all, as each exclaimed that such a discussion was “premature” as there had not yet been a vote on measure K… whatever THAT has to do with the price of rice in China.
What needs to be put right next to this piece is the streaming video moment of the Aug 1 council meeting where Souza, Asmundson and Saylor refused Heystek’s request to agendize this issue for discussion, a full 3 months before the Nov. ballot. Their explanation for denial made no sense at all, as each exclaimed that such a discussion was “premature” as there had not yet been a vote on measure K… whatever THAT has to do with the price of rice in China.
What needs to be put right next to this piece is the streaming video moment of the Aug 1 council meeting where Souza, Asmundson and Saylor refused Heystek’s request to agendize this issue for discussion, a full 3 months before the Nov. ballot. Their explanation for denial made no sense at all, as each exclaimed that such a discussion was “premature” as there had not yet been a vote on measure K… whatever THAT has to do with the price of rice in China.
What needs to be put right next to this piece is the streaming video moment of the Aug 1 council meeting where Souza, Asmundson and Saylor refused Heystek’s request to agendize this issue for discussion, a full 3 months before the Nov. ballot. Their explanation for denial made no sense at all, as each exclaimed that such a discussion was “premature” as there had not yet been a vote on measure K… whatever THAT has to do with the price of rice in China.
That’s a good idea.
That’s a good idea.
That’s a good idea.
That’s a good idea.
an explanation may be in order… the line… what has That to do with the price of rice in China should not be taken literally. It is an somewhat dated expression that calls attention to non-sequiturs.
an explanation may be in order… the line… what has That to do with the price of rice in China should not be taken literally. It is an somewhat dated expression that calls attention to non-sequiturs.
an explanation may be in order… the line… what has That to do with the price of rice in China should not be taken literally. It is an somewhat dated expression that calls attention to non-sequiturs.
an explanation may be in order… the line… what has That to do with the price of rice in China should not be taken literally. It is an somewhat dated expression that calls attention to non-sequiturs.
Good letter to the editor today by Gene Borack responding to Souza’s letter and mentioning the exchange. We’ve got to get the DVD and then we’ll put up on here, probably end of this week.
Good letter to the editor today by Gene Borack responding to Souza’s letter and mentioning the exchange. We’ve got to get the DVD and then we’ll put up on here, probably end of this week.
Good letter to the editor today by Gene Borack responding to Souza’s letter and mentioning the exchange. We’ve got to get the DVD and then we’ll put up on here, probably end of this week.
Good letter to the editor today by Gene Borack responding to Souza’s letter and mentioning the exchange. We’ve got to get the DVD and then we’ll put up on here, probably end of this week.