By Kimberly Torres
NEW YORK, NY – Earlier this month Managing director of communications Anthony Chiarito put out a statement on behalf of the Bronx Defenders “in response to proposals by the industry advocacy group ‘Collective Action to Protect our Stores’ to expand criminalization in response to concerns about safety and theft.”
Chiarito explains said the conversation centers around “Complaints from retail employees have centered on allegations of assaults committed during thefts. Under Penal Law § 160.10(2), such alleged conduct amounts to Robbery in the 2nd degree, a violent felony offense.”
“Everyone has a right to be safe and no one should fear going to work,” he said.
But, Chiarito argues stricter laws are not the answer to this ongoing issue.
“Changing state laws to jail more Black, brown and low-income people won’t meaningfully protect retail stores or workers. Most people arrested for petty theft are struggling with poverty, mental health issues, drug use, or all three,” he said.
Chiarito adds the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic took a financial toll on the country, especially for those living under the poverty line, noting, “The tumult of the pandemic upended society and violence and disorder increased across the country, especially in states and cities with weaker safety nets.”
“If a person is convicted of the robbery charge, the penalty is up to 15 years in prison. However, all parties often agree to lesser penalties — not because they are confused about the law, but because they recognize that issues of poverty, mental health and/or substance use are often involved and incarceration would only worsen the problem,” Chiarito said.
“In such cases, the bail law allows judges to set money bail, remand a person to jail without bail, set non-monetary conditions of release, or require supervised release or electronic monitoring. Last year the legislature amended the bail law to allow judges to set money bail on any person charged with retail theft if that person has an open case for retail theft (CPL § 510.10(4)(t)).” Chiarito states
“Thus, even in cases with no allegation of assault, judges have wide discretion to set bail on those charged with petty shoplifting. Under the current law judges must also consider an individual’s “activities and history,” the charges they are facing, and their “criminal conviction record” in every single case when making determinations about pre-trial release (CPL § 510.10(1)).” he continues.
Chiarito suggested CAPS (Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy) is a surrogate to prison.
“Alternatives to incarceration can begin to address these issues, but we understand that these matters are complex….We invite CAPS to meet with us so that we can work together to expand investments in resources and develop policies that will actually promote safety and prevent violence in our communities.” Chiarito says.
Chiarito said, “Creating Hierarchies of Victims is Wrong and Dangerous.”
Chiarito points out the injustice is associated with the way different kinds of illegal activities are handled, explaining, “Under the current law, an assault that doesn’t result in serious physical injury is a Class A misdemeanor, with a penalty of up to a year in jail. Some have suggested elevating this offense to a felony when the person alleged to be harmed is a retail worker.”
Chiarito states, “The penal law does include harsher penalties for assaults involving people of some other professions and there is no evidence that such laws have deterred violence.”
He goes on to explain how “This budget presents an opportunity to make the investments in community safety that will truly address the problem: supportive and re-entry housing, protections against arbitrary evictions, an inclusive safety net, material support for victims and survivors, evidence-backed harm reduction resources and more.”
Chiarito reiterates, “everybody deserves to be safe, regardless of their profession. The safety and security of teachers, nurses, food delivery workers, retail workers and people who are unemployed all have great and equal value.
“Lawmakers ranking one profession above others in criminal law sends a wrong and dangerous message and reinforces a system of prioritizing political salience above individual and community safety.”