Homeless Citizens ‘Aggressively’ Thrown from Stockton Blvd. Encampment – Activist Groups Urge Health Department to Intervene


By Kelly Moran 

SACRAMENTO––  “We are in a state of crisis here locally in Sacramento..we may be the best city to live [in], but we are not the best city to live [in] if you are poor or unhoused,” charged Faye Wilson Kennedy of the Sacramento Poor People’s Campaign here during a press conference held Tuesday morning via Zoom.

Kennedy along with Crystal Sanchez of SOUP, the Sacramento Homeless Union, demanded that the Sacramento County Health Department intervene in the current evictions of an encampment for the unhoused on Stockton Blvd.

Earlier in the week, a sweep was already made on 47th Street and Stockton, and now unhoused people living on the nearby, privately owned 50101 Stockton Blvd. lot were being forcibly removed without receiving the proper and necessary resources, especially for those who are sick with COVID-19.

With many shelters shut down due to the COVID-19 pandemic, or filled to maximum capacity with long waiting lists, these people really have nowhere else to go, and it seems that the city of Sacramento is not meeting these people’s needs.

Sanchez addressed the status of the jeopardized lot, explaining that it is privately owned, but that the owner “gave the city of Sacramento six months to house and place these folks, and they’ve done nothing… the negligence of the city is super important here.

“The public health department has the authority and the power to take control of this right now,” said Sanchez, referring to the rampant spread of the virus in the encampments, and adding, “the city and the county and the public health department have to do everything they can do to curb this contagion and we don’t feel that they are protecting our least vulnerable at this point.”

She was noting that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) months ago issued recommendations to communities to not do what Sacramento is doing—breaking up encampments of the homeless. The CDC said such action would spread the homeless to other parts of the area, including any COVID infections.

According to Kennedy, there are more than 11,000 homeless people in the city of Sacramento, including 70 under the age of 18. More than 100 of those people live in the threatened encampment, and with the heavy rainstorms approaching later this week and temperatures dropping, the immediate concern is finding them safe shelter to protect them from the hazardous elements.

Immediately opening up a “warming center,” a safe place for the unhoused to go when the weather is unbearably cold, is high up on Sanchez and Kennedy’s list of asks.

“They are bringing out a list of fraudulent resources that have been shut down since March of 2020,” Sanchez continued. The only resource provided, she said, was an attempt to move the women into a nearby shelter four days ago, which has since been cancelled due to an outbreak of COVID-19 in the shelter.

Kennedy brought up a recent example of an unhoused pregnant woman with whom she has been in touch, who was provided housing by the Sacramento police at a local motel.

“They placed her there without any food, without any way of communicating with folks,” said Kennedy, explaining that the woman had found a way to call her and asked for food. Kennedy and her husband immediately drove food and other necessary supplies to the motel the next morning.

“If they’re going to provide emergency housing and shelter, you just can’t drop off a pregnant woman without any resources, whether it’s a phone, food—and that’s been happening” said Kennedy.

Sanchez also claimed that COVID-19 positive, unhoused patients that had been in the hospital were only dumped back out on the streets, further infecting others in the encampment where testing is not prioritized.

Kevin Carter, a representative for the Sacramento Poor People’s Campaign, went to the Stockton Blvd. encampment earlier Tuesday to see for himself exactly what was going on. Carter explained that he works to provide unhoused people with basic needs that they are unable to obtain.

He told members of the conference that the city supplied security guards along with a police presence to ensure people left. Carter witnessed one man who didn’t agree to leave and was placed in handcuffs.

“Both of these groups are very aggressive in their tactics,” Carter said, “they were even aggressive with me, telling me that I could not be on the property.

“I tried to explain to them that I’m here to see if there is anybody here that may need help, and they said it doesn’t matter,” continued Carter.

Carter also said that when the unhoused people moved the belongings that they could carry to the sidewalk, they were once again told to move as it is private property, even though sidewalks are public domain.

“They’ve ordinanced everything to death where people can’t exist anywhere,” said Sanchez, “you can’t be on the sidewalk, you can’t be near a street because it’s public safety, you can’t be on an empty lot even if it’s for sale, they’ve given them no options.”

“It’s hard for people like me and other people that do basic needs,” Carter said, “to go out to these encampments and fulfill the needs of the people, when they’re being pushed and dragged and displaced.”

Despite the risk of spreading COVID-19, Carter said that neither the security guards nor the police officers were wearing protective masks.

Carter also said that the police are claiming that the reason behind the sudden evictions is because the private owner of the lot wants the unhoused people off, but according to Carter, “it’s not the owner that wants them off the property, its code enforcement that wants them off the property, and the threat is that if you don’t get them off the property, we will continue to fine you (the owner).”

Carter stressed the fact that the biggest issue is the absence of the city and Sacramento’s elected officials from this crisis.

“We’re not hearing back from city officials, even at the COVID-19 call,” Carter said. “The last three meetings we have had, everybody has been at the meeting except for the city, and that is a big problem, because…nobody knows what they’re doing.

“Especially with Eric Guerra,” Carter continued, “this is in his district. Eric has been quiet, he has not said anything, he has not come forward to do anything for the unhoused.”

“When it comes to the COVID money for the homeless, they’re quick to come and grab it, but we have to actually question, what are you really doing with it, and what we see today, you’re policing, you’re policing and that’s it, but you can’t police poverty… you have to do the right thing with it, and that is to give organizations that come out and do this work and make sure that they do it diligently, and be patient with the people that are going through these struggles,” Carter added.

Homeless advocates have previously revealed they have discovered that much of the pandemic funds from state or federal sources, and other city funding for the homeless, have not been used to directly help the unhoused.

Instead, it has been spent—millions of dollars—to pay for overtime for police, who are the ones who tear down the only “homes” the unhoused have, destroying tents, sleeping bags and other meager items.

“This is the city and county’s responsibility,” said Sanchez, “we elect these people, it is we the people, all of us, not just these folks that think they can be in political control.”

She explained, “We know that the local health officer may take any preventive measure that may be necessary to protect and preserve the public health from any public health hazard during any ‘state of war emergency,’ ‘state of emergency,’ or ‘local emergency, as defined by Section 8558 of the Government Code, within his or her jurisdiction.

“Furthermore, the Board of Supervisors of each county shall take measures as may be necessary to preserve and protect the public health in the unincorporated territory of the county, including, if indicated, the adoption of ordinances, regulations, and orders not in conflict with general laws, and provide for the payment of all expenses incurred in enforcing them.

”We ask that the unhoused be put in hotels under the definition of shelter in place which is to find a safe location indoors in the case of an emergency and stay there until they are given the ‘all clear.’”

Sanchez noted the following reasons to intervene:

On December 11, 2020, the weather will range from a high of 57 °F to a low of 34 °F for the next 7 days, with the daily likelihood of rain ranging from 12 – 97 percent.

“Studies of human biology indicate that cold weather injuries can occur in the general population during low (>55 °F) and moderate (32−55°F) cold stress, in addition to high-cold stress (<32 °F) and the likelihood of hypothermia increases by over 50 percent for every 10 degree drop in temperature and by 10 percent for every 1 mm increase in precipitation.

“Right now, we have people entrenched in deep puddles of water from the rains, due to the refusal of a trash can being placed there and now trash is mix with these puddles in which people are living. There are no shelters there are no Eaves there is no place for these people to be.

“On August 6, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued Interim Guidance on Unsheltered Homelessness and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for Homeless Service Providers and Local Officials. As I know that many of these things are not happening in Sacramento including priority housing, we still have seniors, chronic conditions, age, and everyone still living in these camps.  We are not receiving any resources on the ground, including:

  • People experiencing unsheltered homelessness, that persons are sleeping outside or in places not meant for human habitation — may be at risk for infection when there is community spread of COVID-19.
  • Some people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness may be at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 due to older age or certain underlying medical conditions, such as chronic lung disease or serious heart conditions.
  • Connecting people to stable housing should continue to be a priority.
  • Shelters should stay open unless homeless service providers, health departments, and housing authorities have determined together that a shelter needs to close.
  • If individual housing options are not available, allow people who are living unsheltered or in encampments to remain where they are. We should strictly follow CDC guidelines by refraining from clearing encampments.
  • Clearing encampments can cause people to disperse throughout the community and break connections with service providers. This increases the potential for infectious disease spread.
  • Immediately provide unsheltered homelessness individual rooms in real-time as the form of housing as stated in the Health Order of May 22, 2020. Also, the Health Orders and relevant sections of the California Health and Safety Code apply to both public and private property and take precedence over the removal of trespassers.”

Kelly Moran is currently a senior at Santa Clara University, though originally from Connecticut. She is majoring in English, with a focus on British Literature and Professional Writing, and is also minoring in Journalism.

To sign up for our new newsletter – Everyday Injustice – https://tinyurl.com/yyultcf9

Support our work – to become a sustaining at $5 – $10- $25 per month hit the link:

About The Author

The Vanguard Court Watch operates in Yolo, Sacramento and Sacramento Counties with a mission to monitor and report on court cases. Anyone interested in interning at the Courthouse or volunteering to monitor cases should contact the Vanguard at info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org - please email info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org if you find inaccuracies in this report.

Related posts


  1. Ron Oertel

    I happened upon the following video last night, which had a theme that was very similar to “Seattle is Dying”.  It is a lengthy video, but is quite compelling regarding homelessness, drug use, crime, etc.  It also briefly touches on the takeover of a portion of Seattle, during the BLM protests.

    It also focuses on the mentality of civic leaders, which enables this.  The video makes a very strong argument regarding that, as well as the ineffectiveness of not interceding. In my opinion, this video might even be more effective than “Seattle is Dying”.

    This video is entitled, “The Fight for the Soul of Seattle”.


    1. Alan Miller

      Thanks, RO.  I thought “Seattle is Dying” laid out the problem and the issues, but didn’t quite put a bow on it.  I’ll check this link out when I have time and get back to you with my thoughts.  Amazing this is also Seattle based.

      1. Ron Oertel

        I didn’t check, but I think it’s from the same news team as “Seattle is Dying”.

        It starts off in a rather hyperbolic manner again, but it ultimately makes sense. At the end of the video, they provide an example of a possible (but expensive) solution. A combination of enforcement and treatment.

        It also brutally-exposes some of the beliefs of officials, which enables the problem to continue. Not unlike what some believe in California.

        1. Alan Miller

          Not unlike what some believe in California.

          Many some of those “some” haunt the City Council chambers during less virussy times.  Perhaps we should start referring to them as the “usual somespects”.

      2. Alan Miller

        I’ll check this link out when I have time and get back to you with my thoughts.

        Hey RO, thanks for this tip!

        “The Fight for the Soul of Seattle” is fantastic.   It’s like they took Seattle is Dying and polished it up, really improved the solutions part, and just really did their homework and used a really talented team to create a great production.  I’d show FFSOS above SID any day.  Great stuff.

        The part near the end where the guy had his son back and in recent recovery and they said like, “and realizing just how delicate this sobriety is” or something like that — really wrenched my heart.

        1. Ron Oertel

          I thought it was better, too.

          Some people might be put-off by the tone (initially), but it makes a lot of sense overall.

          The guy with the bike shop illustrated the problem with just letting this continue (regarding the impact on the “non-homeless”, and ultimately – on city finances).

          I’ve been watching other YouTube videos as well, especially regarding the massive problem in Los Angeles. (For the most part, those amateur-produced videos just show how things are, without the depth of reporting that the Seattle video has.)

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for