Criminal Justice Leaders File Amicus Brief to Stop Texas from Targeting Transgender Kids and Their Parents


Special to the Vanguard

Austin, TX – Following an announcement that the State of Texas intends to prosecute parents who seek gender-affirming care for their transgender children, a bipartisan group of 93 criminal justice leaders from around the nation – including current and former prosecutors, law enforcement leaders and Attorneys General, and former Department of Justice officials and judges – filed an amicus brief in the 353rd District Court of Texas in Jane Doe v. Greg Abbott, supporting efforts to block the State of Texas.

The signatories argue that Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s directive to the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to investigate, and potentially prosecute, these parents for child abuse – and to involve medical professionals, others who care for children, and even members of the general public in this mandate – will result in grave harm to already vulnerable young people. As noted in the brief, these divisive and deeply troubling policies erode public trust in the integrity of the justice system, and thereby inhibit the ability of law enforcement to keep communities safe.

Read the brief here.

“Instead of promoting policies that can actually make our communities safer and healthier, some state leaders in Texas have decided their priority is to attack the trans community and criminalize life-saving care,” said Miriam Krinsky, Executive Director of Fair and Just Prosecution, the organizer of the brief, and a former federal prosecutor. “At a time when trust in government is in dire need of fortifying, this unthinkable action will only serve to deepen biases and divides in our community, put loving parents and their children at risk and further marginalize an already vulnerable population. And all of this inevitably will erode faith in the rule of law – an essential ingredient in maintaining public safety.”

“As a former state prosecutor and the former head of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, I know how critical it is to use limited government resources to protect our most vulnerable,” said Shay Bilchik, former Chief Assistant State Attorney for Miami-Dade County, Fla., former Director of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and a signatory to the brief. “These Texas directives turn this foundational principle on its head, transforming laws designed to shield children into a sword used against those who love and care for them. We cannot idly stand by and let this happen.”

The signatories emphasize in the brief the devastating impact the Governor’s actions will have: “By singling out families with transgender children for government interference and opening the door to intrusions into the privacy of deeply personal medical care, while also triggering potential family separation and even prosecution based on clinically recommended treatment, Governor Abbott, Commissioner Masters, and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services have profoundly threatened both public trust and the well-being of these children and their loved ones. Mandates and policies such as these create troubling and destructive barriers between members of vulnerable communities and law enforcement and will only increase the risk of victimization, abuse and violence these individuals face.”

“When the public does not believe the government is working for them and is instead actively doing harm, our entire system of public safety crumbles,” said Bexar County, Texas District Attorney Joe Gonzales, one of a number of elected prosecutors in Texas and around the nation to join the brief. “As an elected prosecutor, I have an obligation to pursue justice, and it would be completely unjust to punish parents simply for providing their children with the care they need.”

“Why would people call law enforcement to ask for help when they believe that the government is utilizing its resources to prosecute loving parents?” said Joseph Brann, former Hayward, Calif. Police Chief, former Director of the DOJ Office of Community Oriented Policing Services and another signatory to the brief. “Anti-trans laws undermine the integrity of the criminal legal system, which makes the job of law enforcement even harder and compromises public safety.”

Signatories include Texas District and County Attorneys John Creuzot (Dallas County), Delia Garza (Travis County Attorney), José Garza (Travis County DA), Joe Gonzales (Bexar County), Mark Gonzalez (Nueces County), Christian D. Menefee (Harris County) and Brian Middleton (Fort Bend County); Attorneys General Thomas J. Donovan, Jr. (Vermont), Keith Ellison (Minnesota), Leevin Camacho (Guam), Kathy Jennings (Delaware) and Karl A. Racine (District of Columbia); current law enforcement leaders including Chief Abdul D. Pridgen (San Leandro, Calif.) and Sheriffs Steven Tompkins (Suffolk County, Mass.) and Jerry Clayton (Washtenaw County, Mich.); former Police Chiefs Joseph Brann, Richard Biehl, RaShall Brackney, Brendan Cox, Darrel Stephens and Jim Bueermann; former U.S. Attorneys Barbara McQuade and Joyce Vance; and former judges Nancy Gertner (U.S. District Court, Massachusetts) and William Royal Furgeson, Jr. (U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas), among others.


About The Author

Disclaimer: the views expressed by guest writers are strictly those of the author and may not reflect the views of the Vanguard, its editor, or its editorial board.

Related posts

3 thoughts on “Criminal Justice Leaders File Amicus Brief to Stop Texas from Targeting Transgender Kids and Their Parents”

    1. David Greenwald

      For those wanting a more specific explanation of what “gender-affirming hormone treatment” entails, The Trevor Project points to this statement within its report:

      “Medical-affirming care can include treatments that postpone physical changes associated with puberty, as well as treatments that lead to changes that would affirm one’s gender identity. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, commonly known as “puberty blockers,” are used to delay the onset of puberty, while gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is used to promote gender-affirming physical changes. GAHT allows transgender and nonbinary youth to develop physical characteristics that align with their gender identity and is appropriate for those who have begun puberty or following the use of puberty blockers. Access to GAHT is especially important during adolescence because some effects of puberty are not easily reversed by GAHT in adulthood (e.g., testosterone’s effects on voice).” Typically, gender-affirming care does not involve surgical procedures for youth younger than 18, despite claims by some opponents of gender-affirming care that children as young as five are taking hormones and having surgery. Politifact looked into such claims and rated them “false.”

      1. Alan Miller

        OK, thanks.  I am quite interested in this as I have a cousin who’s child decided to switch sexual identity entering puberty and it clearly fits them.  They are dealing with the ‘what if’ if their kid decides they want to go further than just stating identity.  This is all recent.

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for