Doubts Expressed Even after New Supreme Court Ethics Established, Following Public Scrutiny over Justice Thomas’ Benefits from Wealthy Conservatives 

Share:
PC: David
Via Flickr Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.

By Sofia Hosseinzadeh

WASHINGTON, DC – The Supreme Court announced Monday a new code of conduct in response to a growing public belief in a lack of faith in the Supreme Court justice’s capability to follow ethics guidelines, with CNN suggesting it was largely because critics are questioning recent behavior by Justice Clarence Thomas.

“The absence of a Code… has led in recent years to the misunderstanding that the Justices of this Court, unlike all other jurists in this country, regard themselves as unrestricted by any ethics rules. To dispel this misunderstanding, we are issuing this Code, which largely represents a codification of principles that we have long regarded as governing our conduct.” the justices explained.

Democrats in Congress also put pressure on the Supreme Court to begin regulating justice ethics, according to CNN, noting plans by Democrats to pass legislation enforcing an ethics reform in addition to investigations by the Senate Judiciary Committee to “hold a vote to authorize subpoenas for two major conservative players close to conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.”

The new ethics code declares, “A Justice should not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor, or fear of criticism.”

According to The New York Times, Justice Thomas has received “vacations on a superyacht” and “private school tuition” from Texas billionaire Harlan Crow, all unreported by the justice, raising fears about possible ethics violations.

On top of these benefits from Crow, Justice Thomas has also obtained other unreported benefits through his affiliation with the Horatio Alger Association, some by “major donors to conservative causes with broad policy and political interests and much at stake in Supreme Court decisions,” the NY Times added.

Revolving Door Project Executive Director Jeff Hauser responded to this new code, arguing, “This unenforceable public relations document serves absolutely no purpose other than to permit the media to revert to pretending that our unaccountable and unethical supreme court retains legitimacy.”

The conduct of behavior exhibited by Justice Clarence Thomas, in particular, has “long been at odds with any pretense to any remotely serious standard of ethics,” Hauser writes.

The justices Monday asserted in the new code that they will “maintain and observe high standards of conduct in order to preserve the integrity and independence of the United States,” a statement Hauser questions.

He urged the media to continue their vigilance in investigating and reporting on the actions of the Supreme Court justices to ensure their proper conduct and impartial decision making.

“Today’s Code of Conduct represents a big test for the nation’s media and legal elites. Will a risible PR stunt succeed in relieving pressure off a Supreme Court that is rightly widely deemed to be in crisis? People who care about the rule of law must hope those who lead our national coverage about the Supreme Court are not readily co-opted by lawyering that, truth be told, is not even especially slick or sophisticated,” Hauser concluded.

Share:

About The Author

The Vanguard Court Watch operates in Yolo, Sacramento and Sacramento Counties with a mission to monitor and report on court cases. Anyone interested in interning at the Courthouse or volunteering to monitor cases should contact the Vanguard at info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org - please email info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org if you find inaccuracies in this report.

Related posts

One thought on “Doubts Expressed Even after New Supreme Court Ethics Established, Following Public Scrutiny over Justice Thomas’ Benefits from Wealthy Conservatives ”

  1. Walter Shwe

    I am glad to see that the Vanguard is covering this important story. Conservative corruption and hypocracy have found its way to our nation’s highest court. It must be nice to have billionaire friends with benefits when it comes to Samuel Alito and Clarence and Ginni Thomas. These so-called standards just codify what was already in existence. As many have pointed out there is no enforcement mechanism. These guidelines are toothless and comprise a horrible right wing joke. It’s no wonder that public faith in the SCOTUS stands at an all time low. The Court has brought this sad state of affairs upon themselves.

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for