About The Author

David Greenwald is the founder, editor, and executive director of the Davis Vanguard. He founded the Vanguard in 2006. David Greenwald moved to Davis in 1996 to attend Graduate School at UC Davis in Political Science. He lives in South Davis with his wife Cecilia Escamilla Greenwald and three children.

Related posts

36 Comments

  1. Thomas Randall, Jr

    Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:

    http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w

    Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule

  2. Thomas Randall, Jr

    Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:

    http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w

    Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule

  3. Thomas Randall, Jr

    Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:

    http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w

    Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule

  4. Thomas Randall, Jr

    Please note that today in the Davis Enterprise of Sunday, October 26th an ad urging a No Vote on Measure W also appeared on page 3 and there is a website for the “No on W” campaign which can be viewed at the following website link:

    http://www.yvm.net/vme/no-on-w

    Also, check the Davis Access Media (DAM) programing schedule and webcast link page to view yo view the “No on Measure W” programming of that entitites website address at: http://davismedia.org/schedule

  5. Anonymous

    The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.

  6. Anonymous

    The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.

  7. Anonymous

    The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.

  8. Anonymous

    The billions of dollars Yes On W is spending on TV advertisements and other paraphernalia designed to trick gullible voters into accidentally passing this tax increase should be given to the Davis Schools Foundation instead of giving it to the sign, button and bumper sticker makers and the wealthy owners of cable TV stations. What a terrible waste of money, time, wool, plastic, carbon dioxide and Freudian slips.

  9. David M. Greenwald

    If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.

    However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.

  10. David M. Greenwald

    If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.

    However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.

  11. David M. Greenwald

    If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.

    However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.

  12. David M. Greenwald

    If they actually had a billion dollars, I would agree.

    However, I would estimate they have spent somewhere between $30 and $40K, a pretty modest and low budget campaign. As such, I don’t see much impact. If they gave it to the Davis Schools Foundation they would need to collect $2.36 million rather than $2.4 million. Neither one is feasible, especially on a continuing basis.

  13. Buzz

    I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!

  14. Buzz

    I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!

  15. Buzz

    I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!

  16. Buzz

    I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles. Mr. Randall’s site proved to be frought with punctuation, spelling, syntax, and literary flow discrepancies. In short, it was a poorly-structured diatribe. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD. We have a wonderful public school system, made possible through the generosity and caring nature of our citizens. Let’s keep it that way…VOTE YES ON W!

  17. Rich Rifkin

    “I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”

    Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.

    Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?

  18. Rich Rifkin

    “I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”

    Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.

    Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?

  19. Rich Rifkin

    “I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”

    Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.

    Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?

  20. Rich Rifkin

    “I visited the “No-on-W” site, to try and understand the proposition from both angles…. Perhaps Mr. Randall would like to attend some composition classes at DJUSD.”

    Sorry for my pedantry, Buzz, but your comment calls for it. You should not have a comma after the word site in your first sentence. Second, you wrote “to try and understand,” when you should have written “to try to understand.” And third, your query of Mr. Randall requires a question mark.

    Perhaps you would should enroll in English Writing 100 at Sacramento City College’s Davis Center?

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
Sign up for