Atlanta Officer Who Shot Rayshard Brooks Charged with Felony Murder


By Jaden Jarmel-Schneider

ATLANTA— Garrett Rolfe, the Atlanta police officer placed on administrative leave for shooting and killing 27-year-old Rayshard Brooks in a Wendy’s parking lot, was charged with felony murder Wednesday afternoon.

At a press conference held in an Atlanta courthouse, Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard announced the charges against Rolfe and the other involved officer, Devin Brosnan.

The death of Rayshard Brooks comes in the wake of a long series of Black men dying at the hands of police officers. As protests against law enforcement and calls for defunding police departments sweep across the nation, Atlanta’s response to Brook’s death may serve as a model for holding police officers accountable for their actions while on duty, social justice experts said.

Rolfe and Brosnan initially questioned Brooks, who had fallen asleep in his parked car, at 10:30 p.m. on June 12.

Officers performed a body search and badgered Brooks about possessing weapons, but neither officer informed Brooks that he was under arrest, a breach of Atlanta’s police code. After speaking with him for 41 minutes and 17 seconds, Rolfe grabbed Brooks from the rear to physically restrain him.

According to DA Howard, Brooks never presented himself as a threat, noting, “He was calm, he was cordial, he displayed cooperative nature.”

Brooks, who eventually fled the officers with a Taser, was shot twice in the back, the second shot penetrating his heart. A third shot hit a nearby car with three passengers. Body cam footage revealed that Rolfe’s final words before pulling the trigger were, “I got him!”

For the 2 minutes and 12 seconds following the shooting, as Brooks lay bleeding on the ground, neither Officer Rolfe nor Officer Brosnan requested medical assistance for Brooks, violating Atlanta’s policy that officers must seek timely medical care for victims of police shootings, said the DA.

Instead, footage shows Rolfe kicking Brook’s limp body and Brosnan standing on Brooks’ back. Howard, speaking to the press, clarified that neither of these actions taken as Brooks was “fighting for his life” was sanctioned Atlanta police “control techniques.”

In the course of their investigation, the District Attorney’s office spoke to 10 witnesses, reviewed videos from body cams, dash cams, and bystander’s cellphones, as well as preliminary autopsy and ballistics reports.

After consulting a Taser expert, the DA’s office determined that the Taser that was in Brooks’ possession when he was killed had already been fired twice when Brook’s fled, meaning it could not have been used against the officers.

In determining charges, the DA’s office relied on the 1985 Supreme Court decision in Tennessee v. Gonner, which Howard described as outlining that “when an officer is pursuing a fleeing subject, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses an immediate threat to death or serious immediate injury to the officer.”

Howard’s team concluded from the evidence review that Brooks did not pose a threat to the officers at the time of his death.

“Based on the ways that the officers conducted themselves immediately after the shooting, (their conduct) did not reflect any fear or danger of Mr. Brooks, but their actions reflected other kinds of emotions,” said the DA.

Atlanta Mayor Keisha Bottoms and the Atlanta Police Department both issued public statements condemning Rolfe’s use of excessive force.

Officer Rolfe has been charged with 11 crimes, the most severe of which, felony murder, could carry a life sentence or the death penalty.

Officer Brosnan has been charged with three crimes, including aggravated assault for standing on Brook’s back. For failing to get Brooks timely medical attention, both also face violations of their oaths in office.

In what Howard called a “remarkable” move, Officer Brosnan, who has admitted to stepping on Brook’s back, announced that he would testify against his partner as a witness for the state.

The DA’s office will request that Rolfe be held without bail for the severity of his actions and will ask the court to grant Brosnan a $50,000 bail for his cooperation with the state.

After hearing the description of Brooks’ killing for the first time at the press conference on Wednesday, Tomika Miller, the wife of Rayshard Brooks, who initially planned to speak, was too distressed to address the press. Instead, her attorney, Chris Stuart, commended the “courageousness of Officer Brosnan to step forward and say that something wrong happened.”

Sean Williams, who represents the men in the car by the third shot, also spoke to the press. “Reasonableness never has a deadly weapon being fired when you have innocent bystanders like my clients… The only threat that arose is when the officer pulled out a gun.”

The prosecution of Rolfe and Brosnan are noteworthy in more ways than one. Not only is it only the 40th prosecution of a police officer for misconduct in Fulton County and only the 4th time that the D.A. has requested arrests warrants before criminal indictments, but it is also only the 9th time a police officer has been prosecuted for homicide.

Of the previous eight cases, seven involved Black men and the remaining one involved a Black woman.

Even though arrest warrants have been filed against the two officers, the process leading up to a verdict is long. Because of Georgia’s policy, both cases must be presented to a grand jury for indictment before trial. Howard estimates that with the current grand jury queue, this might not happen until January or February of 2021.

Howard, who is running for reelection as the Fulton County District Attorney, has already received criticism that the severity of his prosecution is being done with political motivations. But many, especially in the immediate wake of George Floyd’s death, view Atlanta’s handling of Rayshard Brook’s killing as a herald of a new era of police accountability.

To sign up for our new newsletter – Everyday Injustice –

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for


About The Author

The Vanguard Court Watch operates in Yolo, Sacramento and Sacramento Counties with a mission to monitor and report on court cases. Anyone interested in interning at the Courthouse or volunteering to monitor cases should contact the Vanguard at info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org - please email info(at)davisvanguard(dot)org if you find inaccuracies in this report.

Related posts

8 thoughts on “Atlanta Officer Who Shot Rayshard Brooks Charged with Felony Murder”

  1. Keith Olsen

    Who in their right mind would want to be a police officer these days?  We’re starting to see many get out of the profession.  Families are asking their loved ones to quit, get a new line of work.  It’s now more dangerous than ever to be cop.

  2. Alan Miller

    Howard, who is running for reelection as the Fulton County District Attorney, has already received criticism that the severity of his prosecution is being done with political motivations. But many, especially in the immediate wake of George Floyd’s death, view Atlanta’s handling of Rayshard Brook’s killing as a herald of a new era of police accountability.

    Um . . . isn’t the first bolded statement directly confirmed by the second bolded statement?

    1. Ron Glick

      When asked about the election’s impact on the case in the press conference  the DA said something to the effect of we can discuss that during the campaign right now this is about the filing of charges based on the facts of the case from the investigation.

      That seemed right to me. Brooks was shot in the back while fleeing.

      Who would want to be a cop? Hopefully someone that won’t shoot fleeing DUI suspects in the back.

  3. Keith Olsen

    Atlanta officers already reacting.

    “This is not an organized thing, it’s not a blue flu, it’s not a strike, it’s nothing like that,” Champion said. “What it actually is is officers protesting that they’ve had enough and they don’t want to deal with it any longer.”

    What’s interesting about this is that usually the communities that suffer the most when police back off are the black communities.

    1. David Greenwald

      That shows the police don’t get it. The police do not want to be held accountable for their mistakes and I’m sorry, but the officer made a series of bad mistakes. THat’s what you are defending, the unwillingness of the police to be held accountable.

      1. Alan Miller

        Some of them probably don’t like being seen as dehumanized devils incarnate, either.  I hate to think how many meals/beverages are being served to cops nowadays infused with raw human spit, and/or, how many cops won’t pass through a fast-food place in uniform anymore, sure that is happening.  I sure wouldn’t go to a Wendys and open up my hamburger to check for clear frothy goo.

Leave a Reply

X Close

Newsletter Sign-Up

X Close

Monthly Subscriber Sign-Up

Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
Sign up for